Re: heimdal http proxy

2021-09-12 Thread Jeffrey Altman
On 9/11/2021 11:22 AM, Charles Hedrick (hedr...@rutgers.edu) wrote: > I’d like to be able to use Kerberos SPNEGO at home. Unfortunately the Mac > uses Heimdal. One premise of this thread is that Apple uses Heimdal as developed at    https://www.heimdal.software/ aka https://github.com/heimdal/

Re: heimdal http proxy

2021-09-12 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 07:49:57AM -0400, Jeffrey Altman wrote: > On 9/11/2021 11:22 AM, Charles Hedrick (hedr...@rutgers.edu) wrote: > > We don’t currently explore our Kerberos servers to the Internet, but we do > > have an https proxy for MIT kerberos. Heimal apparently has its own HTTP > > pro

Re: heimdal http proxy

2021-09-12 Thread Ken Hornstein
>The hope is that the proxy will read requests and validate them. Thus >passing through the proxy would be less dangerous that exposing port 88 >directly. If that’s not true, we should consider the risks of making >port 88 available, or give up. I'm curious as to exactly what validation for reque

Re: heimdal http proxy

2021-09-12 Thread Grant Taylor
On 9/12/21 5:49 AM, Jeffrey Altman wrote: The answer is "yes", but someone would need to development the implementation and submit a pull request. Here's a silly thought. What about using something like socat to listen on local port 88 and have it use the upstream proxy via CONNECT requests (