Re: interaction between caches, KEYRING, and NFS

2017-03-16 Thread Charles Hedrick
Actually, if I have KRB5CCNAME set to a file in /tmp, and kinit as someone else, e.g. admin, that will reinitialize the file in /tmp, losing my original credentials. With KEYRING (I’m using Centos 7), because it’s a collection, there’s some hope of maintaining multiple caches properly. If KRB5C

Re: interaction between caches, KEYRING, and NFS

2017-03-16 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "CH" == Charles Hedrick writes: CH> The KEYRING mechanism is nice, in many ways. But it has some CH> unexpected effects. It's always good to mention the actual OS you are using. I know most modern Linux distros provide the KEYRING CCACHE type which uses the kernel's keyring facility. CH>

Re: interaction between caches, KEYRING, and NFS

2017-03-16 Thread Simo Sorce
On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 18:59 +, Charles Hedrick wrote: > The KEYRING mechanism is nice, in many ways. But it has some > unexpected effects. > > There’s a “primary” key for the usual keyring. But this is a global > object. That is, which cache is primary is the same for all sessions, > and for N