Le 24/05/2018 à 14:36, Narcis Garcia a écrit :
I think it's a good initiative.
Thanks :-)
There is still a basic point that I haven't fully grasped yet: what
is/should be the relation between kdenlive's xml format and MLT's xml
format?
Does it makes sense for Kdenlive to have it's own dtd
Well, the kdenlive's xml is being parsed by mlt at the core. So all the
structure must be MLT compliant enough for the parsing to be successful :)
Basically, kdenlive stores a lot of additional properties (usually prefixed
by "kdenlive"), that are parsed and ignored by MLT.
Besides, kdenlive abuses
