Re: [kde-linux] sourceforge vs. Konqueror [FOLLOW UP]

2012-01-28 Thread James Tyrer
On 01/23/2012 10:55 PM, James Tyrer wrote: On 01/07/2012 03:22 AM, James Tyrer wrote: I find that Konqueror 4.7.95 will not download from SourceForge. Despite that fact the the box: Ask whether to save to disk instead () is checked for the mime type, the file if first opened in the Ark Part.

Re: [kde-linux] sourceforge vs. Konqueror [FOLLOW UP]

2012-01-23 Thread James Tyrer
On 01/07/2012 03:22 AM, James Tyrer wrote: I find that Konqueror 4.7.95 will not download from SourceForge. Despite that fact the the box: Ask whether to save to disk instead () is checked for the mime type, the file if first opened in the Ark Part. This appears to work correctly now. -- Jam

Re: [kde-linux] sourceforge vs. Konqueror

2012-01-11 Thread Duncan
James Tyrer posted on Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:30:34 -0700 as excerpted: > On 01/09/2012 09:18 AM, Duncan wrote: >> James Tyrer posted on Mon, 09 Jan 2012 06:03:32 -0700 as excerpted: >> I decided it was time to upgrade gcc from the 4.5 series to the 4.6 series (4.6.2), and rebuild my entire

Re: [kde-linux] sourceforge vs. Konqueror

2012-01-10 Thread James Tyrer
On 01/09/2012 09:18 AM, Duncan wrote: James Tyrer posted on Mon, 09 Jan 2012 06:03:32 -0700 as excerpted: I decided it was time to upgrade gcc from the 4.5 series to the 4.6 series (4.6.2), and rebuild my entire system with the new gcc but upgrading to the new kde at the same time, so I wouldn'

Re: [kde-linux] sourceforge vs. Konqueror

2012-01-09 Thread Duncan
James Tyrer posted on Mon, 09 Jan 2012 06:03:32 -0700 as excerpted: >> I decided it was time to upgrade gcc from the 4.5 series to the 4.6 >> series (4.6.2), and rebuild my entire system with the new gcc but >> upgrading to the new kde at the same time, so I wouldn't end up doing >> it twice. >> >

Re: [kde-linux] sourceforge vs. Konqueror

2012-01-09 Thread James Tyrer
On 01/07/2012 09:38 PM, Duncan wrote: James Tyrer posted on Sat, 07 Jan 2012 19:53:18 -0700 as excerpted: IAC, I went through the MIME types again and it still doesn't work the way that SourceForge is supposed to work. Have you checked the URL either manually or with something like links or l

Re: [kde-linux] sourceforge vs. Konqueror

2012-01-07 Thread Duncan
James Tyrer posted on Sat, 07 Jan 2012 19:53:18 -0700 as excerpted: > IAC, I went through the MIME types again and it still doesn't work the > way that SourceForge is supposed to work. Have you checked the URL either manually or with something like links or lynx to see what mimetype sourceforge

Re: [kde-linux] sourceforge vs. Konqueror

2012-01-07 Thread James Tyrer
On 01/07/2012 06:32 AM, Duncan wrote: James Tyrer posted on Sat, 07 Jan 2012 03:22:03 -0700 as excerpted: I find that Konqueror 4.7.95 will not download from SourceForge. Despite that fact the the box: Ask whether to save to disk instead () is checked for the mime type, the file if first open

Re: [kde-linux] sourceforge vs. Konqueror

2012-01-07 Thread Duncan
James Tyrer posted on Sat, 07 Jan 2012 03:22:03 -0700 as excerpted: > I find that Konqueror 4.7.95 will not download from SourceForge. Despite > that fact the the box: > > Ask whether to save to disk instead () > > is checked for the mime type, the file if first opened in the Ark Part. In my ex