On 06/11/2012 09:47 PM, James Tyrer wrote:
We take as a given that a process can only address 4 GiBs with 32 bits.
However it is also a given that hardware does not need to have that much
physical memory. I fully understand only the Motorola 32K and the Intel
Pentium hardware but I presume that
On 06/07/2012 02:12 AM, Duncan wrote:
Meanwhile, your above isn't quite right either.
Part of it appears to have been left out. But, the point was how to
access all of the 4 GiB of physical memory.
32-bit kernels can only
address 4 gigs at a time, and normally that's split between user an
James Tyrer posted on Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:22:50 -0700 as excerpted:
> I would want to run only the Kernel as 64 bit so that it could address a
> full 1 GB of memory and leave 3 GB for the applications. That is the
> main advantage of 64 bit -- the ability to address more memory.
Following up on
On 11/13/2011 12:45 AM, Duncan wrote:
James Tyrer posted on Sat, 12 Nov 2011 19:24:48 -0700 as excerpted:
But, I probably won't have to worry about it any more since I just
installed 4 GiB of RAM. System does run much faster.
=:^)
You can't use all of it with 32 bits -- KInfoCenter says it
James Tyrer posted on Sat, 12 Nov 2011 19:24:48 -0700 as excerpted:
> But, I probably won't have to worry about it any more since I just
> installed 4 GiB of RAM. System does run much faster.
=:^)
> You can't use all of it with 32 bits -- KInfoCenter says it sees
> 3.22 GiBs. I haven't decided
On 11/12/2011 06:26 AM, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
On Friday 11 November 2011, James Tyrer wrote:
On 11/10/2011 12:19 AM, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
On Thursday 10 November 2011, James Tyrer wrote:
On 11/03/2011 10:54 AM, James Tyrer wrote:
Well, I have again wasted most of an hour tryi
Did you follow the link in Pedro's last post? It appears that someone
submitted this background to GNOME as something that wasn't GNOME like.
No wonder I was fooled. Knowing it was GNOME was all I needed to know.
I just added the background from my KSplash theme as a GNOME background.
But,
On Friday 11 November 2011, James Tyrer wrote:
> On 11/10/2011 12:19 AM, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> > On Thursday 10 November 2011, James Tyrer wrote:
> >> On 11/03/2011 10:54 AM, James Tyrer wrote:
> >>> Well, I have again wasted most of an hour trying to make a simple
> >>> change to KDE and
James Tyrer posted on Fri, 11 Nov 2011 17:58:56 -0700 as excerpted:
> Do I understand correctly that if you open a konsole and:
>
> killall plasma-desktop
>
> that this image doesn't show up. I currently have >= 4.7.3 built from
> source by hand -- actually, I use scripts but I wrote the s
On 11/10/2011 01:24 AM, Duncan wrote:
James Tyrer posted on Wed, 09 Nov 2011 23:18:28 -0700 as excerpted:
On 11/03/2011 10:54 AM, James Tyrer wrote:
Well, I have again wasted most of an hour trying to make a simple
change to KDE and have not succeeded. Did someone miss the point that
hiding t
On 11/10/2011 12:19 AM, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
On Thursday 10 November 2011, James Tyrer wrote:
On 11/03/2011 10:54 AM, James Tyrer wrote:
Well, I have again wasted most of an hour trying to make a simple
change to KDE and have not succeeded. Did someone miss the point that
hiding thing
James Tyrer posted on Wed, 09 Nov 2011 23:18:28 -0700 as excerpted:
> On 11/03/2011 10:54 AM, James Tyrer wrote:
>> Well, I have again wasted most of an hour trying to make a simple
>> change to KDE and have not succeeded. Did someone miss the point that
>> hiding things does not make KDE easier
On Thursday 10 November 2011, James Tyrer wrote:
> On 11/03/2011 10:54 AM, James Tyrer wrote:
> > Well, I have again wasted most of an hour trying to make a simple
> > change to KDE and have not succeeded. Did someone miss the point that
> > hiding things does not make KDE easier to use?
> >
> >
On 11/03/2011 10:54 AM, James Tyrer wrote:
Well, I have again wasted most of an hour trying to make a simple
change to KDE and have not succeeded. Did someone miss the point that
hiding things does not make KDE easier to use?
Does anyone know how to change the X root window image (it is behi
On 11/04/2011 11:34 PM, Duncan wrote:
James Tyrer posted on Fri, 04 Nov 2011 21:06:12 -0700 as excerpted:
On 11/03/2011 04:48 PM, Duncan wrote:
James Tyrer posted on Thu, 03 Nov 2011 10:54:01 -0700 as excerpted:
Does anyone know how to change the X root window image (it is behind
the desktop
James Tyrer posted on Fri, 04 Nov 2011 21:06:12 -0700 as excerpted:
> On 11/03/2011 04:48 PM, Duncan wrote:
>> James Tyrer posted on Thu, 03 Nov 2011 10:54:01 -0700 as excerpted:
>>
>>> Does anyone know how to change the X root window image (it is behind
>>> the desktop but sometimes is viable) fo
On 11/03/2011 04:48 PM, Duncan wrote:
James Tyrer posted on Thu, 03 Nov 2011 10:54:01 -0700 as excerpted:
Well, I have again wasted most of an hour trying to make a simple change
to KDE and have not succeeded. Did someone miss the point that hiding
things does not make KDE easier to use?
Doe
James Tyrer posted on Thu, 03 Nov 2011 10:54:01 -0700 as excerpted:
> Well, I have again wasted most of an hour trying to make a simple change
> to KDE and have not succeeded. Did someone miss the point that hiding
> things does not make KDE easier to use?
>
>
> Does anyone know how to change t
18 matches
Mail list logo
