Hi!
> > The version of the existing math/eigen library in ports is still 3.2.10,
> > and at http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/index.php?title=Main_Page is
> > available 3.3.4. Is there any special reason to use this old version or
> > has anyone just updated the port yet?
>
> There's no PR or patch.
Hi!
> The version of the existing math/eigen library in ports is still 3.2.10,
> and at http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/index.php?title=Main_Page is
> available 3.3.4. Is there any special reason to use this old version or
> has anyone just updated the port yet?
There's no PR or patch. KDE builds
Hi!
I've seen
https://community.kde.org/FreeBSD/Setup
and it looks like a disaster 8-} Who can I contact to get write access
to fix it ?
--
p...@freebsd.org +49 171 31013722 years to go !
Hi!
> > I've seen
> >
> > https://community.kde.org/FreeBSD/Setup
My path:
https://freebsd.kde.org/
Select Installation/Setup
and you end up on that page.
> > and it looks like a disaster 8-} Who can I contact to get write access
> > to fix it ?
>
> You sign up for a KDE identity account a
Hi!
Right now devel/py-sip is at 4.16.7 in area51, as far as I can see.
As I'm trying to update emulators/gns3, I'd like to have it at 4.16.8,
if possible. What type of patch/check does it take to update it ?
--
p...@freebsd.org +49 171 31013725 years to go !
___
Hi!
> the KDE/FreeBSD (k...@freebsd.org) has some commiters that currently check in
> our work to the ports tree (see https://freebsd.kde.org/people.php), which to
> my knowledge are mainly makc and rakuco along with Alonso Schaich.
> To help with the situation, it would be really greatly appre
Hi!
> > > If you assign PRs to me that you consider ready to commit, I can do this.
> > > Sometimes it will take a few days, but if that's OK with you...
>
> Hi Kurt, [removed Ralf and Tobias in CC, they'll get it through the list]
>
> Right now all my open PRs can be found through
> https://b
Hi!
> Right now all my open PRs can be found through
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=reporter:gr...@kde.org
>
Can you comment on
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209326
? This seems to have quite a mix of changes, some of which were already
done i
Hi!
> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209326
> >
> > ? This seems to have quite a mix of changes, some of which were already
> > done in other PRs ?
So, one of the patches was reverted, because mat asked it to
be reverted -- any background on that change (Mk/Uses/qmake.mk) ?
Hi!
> this PR is Qt related:
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198574
>
> I have checked that with Virtualbox and witout the patch I get the messages:
Thanks for the pointer, very nice. I suggest: if you find similar PRs,
put those comments into the PR (instead of a mail 8-)
Hi!
> can you make sure you didn't have qbs already installed ? This looks like the
> linker picking up a system library of a qbs installation.
>
> Please make sure you did a pkg remove qbs before.
Done, testbuilds looks much better 8-)
--
p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372
Hi!
> this error will go away with qtcreator 4.0 - the version of qbs and qtcreator
> are tied to each other (meaning, the qbs plugin in creator is tied to the qbs
> version, thus causing compile issues when not matching)
>
> Do you think we should do anything about or just wait until qtcreator
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Originator: Kurt Jaeger
>Organization: -
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: www/qt4-webkit failes to compile on 8.1-amd64
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Category: ports
>Class: sw-bug
>Release:
The following reply was made to PR ports/149984; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Kurt Jaeger
To: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports-b...@freebsd.org
Cc: Kurt Jaeger , le...@lemke-it.com
Subject: Re: ports/149984: www/qt4-webkit failes to compile on 8.1-amd64
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010
The following reply was made to PR ports/149984; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Kurt Jaeger
To: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports-b...@freebsd.org
Cc: Kurt Jaeger , le...@lemke-it.com
Subject: Re: ports/149984: www/qt4-webkit failes to compile on 8.1-amd64
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010
Hi!
> > > Something wrong with 'struct utmp ubuf' in HEAD?
> >
> > Yes. 9-CURRENT migrated to utmpx.
> >
> > man utmpx
>
> yep; ports/net/kdenetwork3 was not ported to this fact :-(
>
> Is KDE3 still maintained for 9-CURRENT?
There are only a few apps left that still require KDE3. Probably
it
Hi!
> > > > > Something wrong with 'struct utmp ubuf' in HEAD?
> > > > Yes. 9-CURRENT migrated to utmpx.
> > > > man utmpx
> > > yep; ports/net/kdenetwork3 was not ported to this fact :-(
> > > Is KDE3 still maintained for 9-CURRENT?
> > There are only a few apps left that still require KDE3.
Hi!
In February, multimedia/dragon was added as part of the KDE 4.9.5 tree.
At that time, devel/dragon, a scanner/parser generator was already
in the tree since approx. 2.5 years.
I have no idea how package naming collissions are resolved, but
is there any requirement to have a uniq package name
Hi!
> If you reeive that mail it means one or more of your ports have
> a package name collision with others.
It's about
devel/dragon
vrs.
multimedia/dragon
So my question to the KDE folks:
Can you rename your port to dragonplayer ?
http://www.kde.org/applications/multimedia/dragonplayer/
--
19 matches
Mail list logo
