https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=266915
--- Comment #4 from Alexey Dokuchaev ---
(In reply to Tobias C. Berner from comment #3)
> it would likely make sense to add qt5/qt6 flavors to the port.
Yes, it would be nice I guess, but it feels like our Qt6 framework is a bit
premature a
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=266915
--- Comment #5 from Tobias C. Berner ---
(In reply to Alexey Dokuchaev from comment #4)
The idea is to split Qt6 once the package/ports have sub-packages.
mfg Tobias
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=266915
--- Comment #6 from Tomoaki AOKI ---
(In reply to Alexey Dokuchaev from comment #4)
devel/qt6-base incorporates multiple components including core, concurrent,
dbus, gui and some more. And some more are ported independently.
Not sure all c
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=266915
--- Comment #7 from Tobias C. Berner ---
(In reply to Tomoaki AOKI from comment #6)
If it only requires core, then it USES=qt:6 and USE_QT=base is enough.
The only thing that the ports tree is missing for Qt6 is the webengine related
stu
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=266950
Bug ID: 266950
Summary: [exp-run] Update KDE Frameworks to 5.99.0
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severi
You are receiving this mail as a port that you maintain
is failing to build on the FreeBSD package build server.
Please investigate the failure and submit a PR to fix
build.
Maintainer: k...@freebsd.org
Log URL:
http://beefy5.nyi.freebsd.org/data/123i386-default/06ade0876922/logs/libdb
