https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251836
Guido Kollerie changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gu...@kollerie.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251836
--- Comment #26 from Guido Kollerie ---
(In reply to Guido Kollerie from comment #25)
Which, now that I think about it, doesn't make any sense as the UHD 620 is not
a Iris class GPU. Meaning the ~/.drirc (with line )
should not matter. But
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251836
--- Comment #27 from Guido Kollerie ---
(In reply to Guido Kollerie from comment (In reply to Guido Kollerie from
comment #25)
Re: works again
With the side note that rendering now happens with with visible artifacts while
the screen updat
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251836
--- Comment #28 from Roman ---
(In reply to Guido Kollerie from comment #25)
Hmm. I tried again to create the 01-freebsd.conf file, but in
/usr/local/share/drirc.d After that, the modesetting driver and
xf86-video-intel version 2.99.917.91
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251836
--- Comment #29 from oleg.nau...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Guido Kollerie from comment #26)
It is
[ 660.475] (II) modeset(0): glamor X acceleration enabled on Mesa Intel(R)
UHD Graphics 620 (KBL GT2)
[ 661.009] (II) modeset(0): [DRI2
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247888
Roman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Open|Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251939
Bug ID: 251939
Summary: math/eigen3: does it really need a GL dependency?
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: amd64
OS: Any
Status: New
Bugzilla Automation has asked freebsd-kde (Team)
for maintainer-feedback:
Bug 251939: math/eigen3: does it really need a GL dependency?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251939
--- Description ---
In the ports r557839 commit the explicit GL dependency has been introduced to
the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251939
Igor Pavlov changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://svnweb.freebsd.org/
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251836
--- Comment #30 from Jan Beich ---
(In reply to Guido Kollerie from comment #26)
> UHD 620 is not a Iris class GPU
iris is also the name of Gallium-based OpenGL driver (still doesn't use LLVM ;)
for Intel Gen8+ GPUs (Broadwell and later).
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251836
--- Comment #31 from Tomasz "CeDeROM" CEDRO ---
Please forgive me a small off topic regarding QT but 6 is already out :-)
https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-6.0-released
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251836
--- Comment #32 from Tomasz "CeDeROM" CEDRO ---
Another question: why Enligthenment stopped working while XFCE4 works fine?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251792
Tobias C. Berner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251939
Thierry Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Open
--- Comment #1 from Thierry
Moin moin
I remember a similar issue on the lock screen some time ago -- but I
don't see it at the moment.
Have you looked whether there is a bug report upstream? This does not
seem like it should be
caused by our packaging.
mfg Tobias
On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 08:32, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
>
>
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244016
--- Comment #8 from Tobias C. Berner ---
Created attachment 220700
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=220700&action=edit
v2
Moin moin
I would suggest using an option, what do you think?
mfg Tobias
--
You are re
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251939
--- Comment #2 from Igor Pavlov ---
Hi,
Yep, it works, but it's rather unobvious what the FULL option means and why a
lightweight math library consumes mesa-libs.
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for th
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251939
--- Comment #3 from Igor Pavlov ---
Shouldn't the FULL option be implemented as another package with dependencies
on eigen3, mesa-libs and so on?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244016
--- Comment #9 from Jan Beich ---
Comment on attachment 220700
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=220700
v2
(In reply to Tobias C. Berner from comment #8)
> +OPTIONS_DEFAULT= NORMAL
Non-default options have no i
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244016
Max Brazhnikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #10
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244016
--- Comment #11 from Jan Beich ---
Probably no, see bug 251947. From wlroots package POV I need xwayland fresh
enough to support new features e.g.,
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/270
https://github.com/swaywm/w
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251939
Alex S changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwt...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from Alex
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251939
--- Comment #5 from Alex S ---
(In reply to Alex S from comment #4)
Oh, wait. Those are dependencies for the unit tests, which the port doesn't
_not_ build. What's the point of this exactly?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
23 matches
Mail list logo
