https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239277
Antoine Brodin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|port...@freebsd.org |tcber...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239512
Bug ID: 239512
Summary: ryzen 5 2600 (12 reported cores) too fast for
devel/ninja
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Bugzilla Automation has asked k...@freebsd.org for
maintainer-feedback:
Bug 239512: ryzen 5 2600 (12 reported cores) too fast for devel/ninja
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239512
--- Description ---
I have had a number of ports fail to build under ninja on my ryzen 2600 mach
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239203
--- Comment #2 from George ---
(In reply to Tobias C. Berner from comment #1)
Because in one internal version (1.0.81 now) new snapshots will be incremented
revisions in port. It is not correct?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239203
Adriaan de Groot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adr...@freebsd.org
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239512
Adriaan de Groot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adr...@freebsd.org
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239203
--- Comment #4 from George ---
(In reply to Adriaan de Groot from comment #3)
Ok, I understand about portrevision.
About dev version 1.0.81, it defines here:
packaging/otter-browser.iss:
#define MyAppVersion "1.0.81-dev"
--
You are recei
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239203
George changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #205767|maintainer-approval?(kde@Fr |
Flags|eeBSD.org)
