FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2017-09-19 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

[Bug 220714] devel/boost-all: Update to 1.65.1

2017-09-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220714 Raphael Kubo da Costa changed: What|Removed |Added CC|k...@freebsd.org | -- You are receiving th

Re: Questions on testing kde5

2017-09-19 Thread Mario Lobo
Thanks for answering. Tobias! Forgive me for bothering you a little more. My machine: FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE #0 r321652M Aug 25 20:19:41 -03 2017 I downloaded the ports branch from https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports-kde/tree/plasma5 On that branch, there are the following ports under x11:

Re: Questions on testing kde5

2017-09-19 Thread Tobias C. Berner
Hi Mario x11/kde is basically the new big-fat metaport. It pulls in the desktop (plasma5) and many applications 1) most of the stuff is under ~/.config now 3) there should be a some import of the configuration happening theoretically... not sure how good it works -- be save, make a backup of your

maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 222463] www/qt5-webengine: "use of undeclared identifier 'ED25519_verify'"

2017-09-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
Peter Kien has reassigned Bugzilla Automation 's request for maintainer-feedback to k...@freebsd.org: Bug 222463: www/qt5-webengine: "use of undeclared identifier 'ED25519_verify'" https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222463 --- Description --- www/qt5-webengine fails to compile on

[Bug 222463] www/qt5-webengine: "use of undeclared identifier 'ED25519_verify'"

2017-09-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222463 Bug ID: 222463 Summary: www/qt5-webengine: "use of undeclared identifier 'ED25519_verify'" Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS:

maintainer-approval requested: [Bug 222207] [cmake] net/ceph & net/ceph-devel: fails to build with boost 1.65 : [Attachment 186555] Backport upstream commits

2017-09-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
Jan Beich has asked k...@freebsd.org for maintainer-approval: Bug 07: [cmake] net/ceph & net/ceph-devel: fails to build with boost 1.65 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07 Attachment 186555: Backport upstream commits https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=186

[Bug 222207] [cmake] net/ceph & net/ceph-devel: fails to build with boost 1.65

2017-09-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07 Jan Beich changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #186555||maintainer-approval?(kde@Fr

[Bug 222207] [cmake] net/ceph & net/ceph-devel: fails to build with boost 1.65

2017-09-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07 --- Comment #5 from Willem Jan Withagen --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #4) Life could be simple, but then it never really is. I'm not really into the version of Boost OR Cmake. Just as long as a new Boost also updates the version

[Bug 222207] [cmake] net/ceph & net/ceph-devel: fails to build with boost 1.65

2017-09-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07 Adriaan de Groot changed: What|Removed |Added CC||adr...@freebsd.org --- Comment