[Bug 210027] devel/qt4-script: ARM Architecture not supported

2016-10-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210027 Tobias C. Berner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |In Progress CC|

[Bug 210027] devel/qt4-script: ARM Architecture not supported

2016-10-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210027 Tobias C. Berner changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://reviews.freebsd.org

[Bug 210027] devel/qt4-script: ARM Architecture not supported

2016-10-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210027 --- Comment #5 from mikael.uran...@gmail.com --- Yes it's a mispelling, a lot of qt ports are affected too, should I open a single PR for all of them or one per port? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug

[Bug 210027] devel/qt4-script: ARM Architecture not supported

2016-10-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210027 --- Comment #6 from Tobias C. Berner --- I think it would be the cleanest if we try to do it in one go in D8322. Do you have a list of the affected ports? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 210027] devel/qt4-script: ARM Architecture not supported

2016-10-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210027 --- Comment #7 from mikael.uran...@gmail.com --- I don't have a list but I can make one. I'm looking the build failures of the last run: http://beefy8.nyi.freebsd.org/build.html?mastername=head-armv6-default&build=p423739_s307008 The core

[Bug 213704] x11/kde: Request to update to KDE Plasma 5.8 LTS

2016-10-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213704 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Open Assignee|freebsd-po

[Bug 213704] x11/kde: Request to update to KDE Plasma 5.8 LTS

2016-10-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213704 gr...@kde.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gr...@kde.org --- Comment #2 from g

Re: First try at a digikam-kf5 port

2016-10-22 Thread Thomas Legg
So I've updated the digikam-kf5 port skeleton for release 5.2.0 and added a kipiplugins-kf5 port that's also been updated to 5.2.0. Had fixed the gphoto2 issues with 5.1.0 release and had cameras/phones detected and transfered files. 5.2.0 works great as long as you haven't compiled the graphics/