Thanks for your prompt reply.
qt3 is not installed on my laptop.
The closest thing is qt4-qt3support which is needed by some kde ports.
Please advise.
Christophe
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa
wrote:
> christophe taranotte writes:
>
>> In file included from
>> /usr/p
You could try something like:
script startx
Then exit X when it's done, and the script command should've put the
output into a text file for you.
adrian
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebs
christophe taranotte writes:
> Thanks for your prompt reply.
>
> qt3 is not installed on my laptop.
>
> The closest thing is qt4-qt3support which is needed by some kde ports.
What does pkg_info -W /usr/local/include/qtextcodec.h return?
___
kde-freebsd
On Thursday 27 October 2011 16:02:58 Alan Hicks wrote:
> Clean build & install on i386 RELEASE-8.2 with patch.
Thank you!
--
Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla
You are dishonest, but never to the point of hurting a friend.
signature.asc
Description: This is a
christophe taranotte writes:
> This is what I get:
>
> QUOTE
> pkg_info: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring
> /usr/local/include/qtextcodec.h was installed by package qt-3.3.8_13
> UNQUOTE
>
> But qt-3.3.8_13 was never installed on my laptop.
Hmm, it looks like you have a
This is what I get:
QUOTE
pkg_info: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring
pkg_info: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring
pkg_info: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring
pkg_info: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring
On 2011-10-27 09:25, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
christophe taranotte writes:
This is what I get:
QUOTE
pkg_info: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring
/usr/local/include/qtextcodec.h was installed by package qt-3.3.8_13
UNQUOTE
But qt-3.3.8_13 was never installed on my
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 00:15:09 -0200
Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
>
> Please deinstall qt3 while you upgrade kde4 until we don't fix it the
> proper way.
I've been thinking of doing this myself, but am just wondering, though,
has anyone actually done this and then tried reinstalling qt3 later,
aft
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> I've been thinking of doing this myself, but am just wondering, though,
> has anyone actually done this and then tried reinstalling qt3 later,
> after kde4 has been upgraded? Were there any problems with doing that?
Quite unlikely: Qt
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:46:17 +0200
Alberto Villa wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Conrad J. Sabatier
> wrote:
> > I've been thinking of doing this myself, but am just wondering,
> > though, has anyone actually done this and then tried reinstalling
> > qt3 later, after kde4 has been upgr
[ 44%] Building CXX object
libk3bdevice/CMakeFiles/k3bdevice.dir/k3bscsicommand.o
[ 45%] Building CXX object libk3bdevice/CMakeFiles/k3bdevice.dir/k3btrack.o
In file included from /usr/ports/sysutils/k3b-
kde4/work/k3b-2.0.2/libk3bdevice/k3bscsicommand.cpp:186:
/usr/ports/sysutils/k3b-
kde4/work/k
On Thursday 27 October 2011 19:19:18 Chuck Burns wrote:
> [ 44%] Building CXX object
> libk3bdevice/CMakeFiles/k3bdevice.dir/k3bscsicommand.o
> [ 45%] Building CXX object libk3bdevice/CMakeFiles/k3bdevice.dir/k3btrack.o
> In file included from /usr/ports/sysutils/k3b-
> kde4/work/k3b-2.0.2/libk3bde
On Thursday, October 27, 2011 8:39:37 PM Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
>
> Is this 9-SOMETHING? Looks like [1].
>
> Anyone on 9 willing to find out what has changed in the scsi stuff to work
> on a patch? :)
>
> [1] http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-freebsd/2011-October/011766.html
Yes, 9.0-RC1.
SVN commit 7776 by rakuco:
k3b-kde4: Add my commit d8f73a5 to upstream.
The scsi_sense_data struct has changed in 9 after r225950, so compilation
failed.
Instead of accessing the struct fields manually, we now use
scsi_extract_sense, which works fine in all our supported releases (there is
no ch
On Thursday 27 October 2011 21:22:44 Chuck Burns wrote:
> On Thursday, October 27, 2011 8:39:37 PM Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> > Is this 9-SOMETHING? Looks like [1].
> >
> > Anyone on 9 willing to find out what has changed in the scsi stuff to work
> > on a patch? :)
> >
> > [1] http://mail.kd
15 matches
Mail list logo