On Wednesday 08 April 2009 12:40:16 pm David Naylor wrote:
> Yes, I think it is more important to get Qt 4.5 into ports ASAP then waste
> time fixing this problem. This problem could be fixed later?
>
> Please see the attached patch that fixes devel/qt4-corelib (and thus Qt4.5
> and libiconv). Th
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 21:41:28 David Johnson wrote:
> > SOLUTION 2:
> > ...
> > The attached files restore the behaviour of the previous code. This
> > probably will result in a performance loss (but remain par with Qt4.4.3).
> > Since the changes are isolated to those two files and the API has
> SOLUTION 1:
> Disable libiconv support altogether. This, I believe, is a viable solution
> since Windows does not have iconv and we should be using whatever fallback
> it does. This should result in no loss of functionality.
This is what I am doing for non-port builds of 4.5.0. It's also what'
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 07:25:16 David Johnson wrote:
> I played around with this, rebuilding libiconv after gettext, but to no
> effect. Oh well, it was worth a shot...
I've managed to get Qt 4.5 to behave well with libiconv. It was a bit of a
cheat though. There is also another solution.
On Monday 06 April 2009 10:25:16 pm David Johnson wrote:
> I'm attaching a screenshot I just made, to show the behavior.
I always forget to attach my attachments :-(
--
David Johnson
<>___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.o
On Monday 06 April 2009 10:54:06 am David Johnson wrote:
> On Monday 06 April 2009 01:06:11 am Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> > So up until recently it did work. You don't say what the nature of
> > "behave" is though -- does it not compile? Not run?
>
> To repeat David Naylor, it builds fine, but all g
On Monday 06 April 2009 01:06:11 am Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> So up until recently it did work. You don't say what the nature of "behave"
> is though -- does it not compile? Not run?
To repeat David Naylor, it builds fine, but all glyphs at runtime are square
boxes.
> > > So which one is impleme
On Monday 06 April 2009 10:06:11 Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> On Thursday 02 April 2009 10:46:24 pm David Naylor wrote:
> > > > I've been trying to get Qt4.5 to behave properly with libiconv and it
> > > > just doesn't. My best understanding is that, under linux, glibc
> > > > provides all the iconv
On Thursday 02 April 2009 10:46:24 pm David Naylor wrote:
> > > I've been trying to get Qt4.5 to behave properly with libiconv and it
> > > just doesn't. My best understanding is that, under linux, glibc
> > > provides all the iconv functionality and that, somehow, libiconv and
> > > glibc differ
On Friday 03 April 2009 20:32:30 David Johnson wrote:
> On Friday 03 April 2009 11:02:20 am David Naylor wrote:
> > What is the course of action from here? Complain to Qt Software, hope
> > someone sorts it out or ignore the problem? Oh and how does one file a
> > bug with Qt Software?
>
> A new
On Friday 03 April 2009 11:02:20 am David Naylor wrote:
> What is the course of action from here? Complain to Qt Software, hope
> someone sorts it out or ignore the problem? Oh and how does one file a bug
> with Qt Software?
A new bug reporting system is being setup, as Qt transitions to a more
On Friday 03 April 2009 18:08:06 David Johnson wrote:
> On Thursday 02 April 2009 01:46:24 pm David Naylor wrote:
> > > I configure Qt with --no-iconv for exactly this reason.
> >
> > Is there any functionality lost? Do you see *any* square blocks after
> > doing this?
>
> I'm not seeing any squar
On Thursday 02 April 2009 01:46:24 pm David Naylor wrote:
> > I configure Qt with --no-iconv for exactly this reason.
>
> Is there any functionality lost? Do you see *any* square blocks after
> doing this?
I'm not seeing any squares. But I don't have a lot of documents in non-latin1
codecs.
--
On Thursday 02 April 2009 21:10:04 David Johnson wrote:
> On Thursday 02 April 2009 07:00:38 am David Naylor wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been trying to get Qt4.5 to behave properly with libiconv and it
> > just doesn't. My best understanding is that, under linux, glibc provides
> > all the iconv f
On Thursday 02 April 2009 07:00:38 am David Naylor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to get Qt4.5 to behave properly with libiconv and it just
> doesn't. My best understanding is that, under linux, glibc provides all
> the iconv functionality and that, somehow, libiconv and glibc differ in
> their
15 matches
Mail list logo
