-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:38:20 -0600
"Jeremy Messenger" wrote:
> Cool w/ me, thanks! If there is any GTK+ or GNOME specific that you don't
> want to mess with. Let us know and we can help you with it.
Thanks for the offer, this one was a no
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:15:35 -0600, Thomas Abthorpe
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 13:41:01 -0600
> "Jeremy Messenger" wrote:
>
>> Me either and I don't know what oscaf (will check later when we actually
>> need it) is.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mezz
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 13:41:01 -0600
"Jeremy Messenger" wrote:
> Me either and I don't know what oscaf (will check later when we actually
> need it) is.
>
> Cheers,
> Mezz
Likewise was totally unaware of it until it was brought to my at
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:50:53 -0600, Joe Marcus Clarke
wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 12:23 -0500, Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Rumour has it that oscaf, http://oscaf.sourceforge.net, has released
>> 0.1 and
>> that future releases of KDE and
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 13:50:53 -0500
Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> This is the first I'm hearing of this, so, no, I don't have it on my
> radar. My next project is porting DevKit-power to FreeBSD.
>
> Joe
Okay, in that case consider it being covered.
Thomas
--
Thomas Abthorpe | FreeBSD
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 12:23 -0500, Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Rumour has it that oscaf, http://oscaf.sourceforge.net, has released 0.1 and
> that future releases of KDE and Gnome will require it.
>
> Does anybody have this on their radar, so we ca
