Hi
This is for the official ports tree. For us, it's fine :)
mfg Tobias
On 26 June 2017 at 07:00, Schaich Alonso wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 23:13:34 +0200
> Adriaan de Groot wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 22 June 2017 21:47:01 Schaich Alonso wrote:
>> > and updated digikam, though the guidelines p
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 22:20:03 +0200
"Tobias C. Berner" wrote:
> btw, there is also a kipiplugins update to 5.6.0 :)
>
graphics/{lib}gphoto2 has a new version, too, though that port is not
maintained by kde@
I've updated kipiplugins and just posted the pull request.
Alonso
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 23:13:34 +0200
Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> On Thursday 22 June 2017 21:47:01 Schaich Alonso wrote:
> > and updated digikam, though the guidelines posted on our github project
> > page ask me not to make a pull request and commit to SVN instead, which
> > has been down for months
gt; page ask me not to make a pull request and commit to SVN instead, which
> has been down for months now. Is the guideline outdated, or do we have
> a new SVN repository?
>
> @adrian / @tcberner, feel free to pull the digikam update or dismiss it
> and write a new one, unless area51
On Thursday 22 June 2017 21:47:01 Schaich Alonso wrote:
> and updated digikam, though the guidelines posted on our github project
> page ask me not to make a pull request and commit to SVN instead, which
> has been down for months now. Is the guideline outdated, or do we have
> a new SVN repository
onths now. Is the guideline outdated, or do we have
a new SVN repository?
@adrian / @tcberner, feel free to pull the digikam update or dismiss it
and write a new one, unless area51 comes alive again.
Alonso
Hello.
Digikam 4.0.0 was released. It seems to be easy to update the port.
The patch against area51 is in attachment.
Thanks
--
Oleg Sidorkin
Index: PORTS/graphics/digikam-kde4/Makefile.common
===
--- PORTS/graphics/digikam-kde4/Mak
