On Thursday, 19. April 2007, Andy Fawcett wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 April 2007 19:02:30 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > On Monday, 16. April 2007, Andy Fawcett wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 05 April 2007 12:29:27 pm John Nielsen wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > > In short, qt will install happily the
On Wednesday 18 April 2007 19:02:30 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Monday, 16. April 2007, Andy Fawcett wrote:
> > > On Thursday 05 April 2007 12:29:27 pm John Nielsen wrote:
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > In short, qt will install happily the first time but not the second.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Origina
On Wednesday 18 April 2007 12:02:30 pm Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Monday, 16. April 2007, Andy Fawcett wrote:
> > > On Thursday 05 April 2007 12:29:27 pm John Nielsen wrote:
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > In short, qt will install happily the first time but not the second.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Orig
On Monday, 16. April 2007, Andy Fawcett wrote:
> > On Thursday 05 April 2007 12:29:27 pm John Nielsen wrote:
> > [...]
> > > In short, qt will install happily the first time but not the second.
>
> [...]
>
> Originally I reported that I wasn't seeing this.
>
> Now, I've just updated to the very la
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 08:58:42PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > Would bumping revision of qmake and qt be enough or were you thinking of
> > something more aggressive?
>
> No - I'm guessing the problem is that qmake generates wrong dependencies in
> Makefiles when it configures Qt with a
dy Fawcett wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > > From: John Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 19:32
> > >
PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 19:32
> > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] qt upgrade strangeness
> > >
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 19:32
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] qt upgrade strangeness
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday 05 April 200
> > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: John Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 19:32
> > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Subject: Re: [kd
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 04:33:55PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > I dimly remember seeing that before - I don't think Qt/qmake can actually
> > handle a PREFIX-move cleanly and once the prefix has changed, it has to be
> > deinstalled *before* rebuilding it, or else this will happen.
>
> Si
t; > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] qt upgrade strangeness
> > >
> > > On Thursday 05 April 2007 12:29:27 pm John Nielsen wrote:
> > > > I've had some trouble upgrading qt on two differen
t; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] qt upgrade strangeness
> > >
> > > On Thursday 05 April 2007 12:29:27 pm John Nielsen wrote:
> > > > I've had some trouble upgrading qt on two different machines n
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 19:32
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] qt upgrade strangeness
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday 05 April 200
On Monday, 16. April 2007, Andy Fawcett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 19:32
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [kde-
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: John Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 19:32
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] qt upgrade strangeness
>
> On Thursday 05 April 2007 12:29:27 pm John Nie
On Friday 06 April 2007 12:38:58 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Thursday, 5. April 2007, John Nielsen wrote:
> > I'd like to determine if 1) this is a known problem
>
> No.
>
> > and 2) this is specific
> > to the Xorg ports tree so I know whether or not to send in a PR.
>
> Could be, at least I ha
On Thursday, 5. April 2007, John Nielsen wrote:
> I'd like to determine if 1) this is a known problem
No.
> and 2) this is specific
> to the Xorg ports tree so I know whether or not to send in a PR.
Could be, at least I haven't seen it on my system yet which runs the ports
xorg.
Cheers
--
I've had some trouble upgrading qt on two different machines now. I'm using
the experimental Xorg git ports tree on both and I'm not sure if that's a
factor, which is why I'm CC-ing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In short, qt will install happily the first time but not the second. It looks
to my untrained e
On Thursday 05 April 2007 12:29:27 pm John Nielsen wrote:
> I've had some trouble upgrading qt on two different machines now. I'm using
> the experimental Xorg git ports tree on both and I'm not sure if that's a
> factor, which is why I'm CC-ing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> In short, qt will install happi
19 matches
Mail list logo
