2012/2/28 Alberto Villa :
> On Tuesday 28 February 2012 15:19:29 Olivier Smedts wrote:
>> On the 2011/10/13, avilla said about the phonon xine backend "we're
>> not going to remove it, don't worry. ;)". I'm not blaming anyone, I
>> was just surprised to see the phonon-xine backend flagged BROKEN so
Olivier Smedts writes:
> On the 2011/10/13, avilla said about the phonon xine backend "we're
> not going to remove it, don't worry. ;)". I'm not blaming anyone, I
> was just surprised to see the phonon-xine backend flagged BROKEN so
> soon after.
We didn't remove the port indeed, but a new libxi
On Tuesday 28 February 2012 15:19:29 Olivier Smedts wrote:
> On the 2011/10/13, avilla said about the phonon xine backend "we're
> not going to remove it, don't worry. ;)". I'm not blaming anyone, I
> was just surprised to see the phonon-xine backend flagged BROKEN so
> soon after.
We weren't expe
2012/2/28 Raphael Kubo da Costa :
> Olivier Smedts writes:
>
>> I've been a happy user of phonon-xine and libxine for quite some time,
>> but with the update of libxine to 1.2.1, phonon-xine refuses to
>> compile :
>> ===>>> This port is marked BROKEN
>> ===>>> deprecated upstream;
On Tuesday 28 February 2012 14:57:04 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> The two backends supported and actively developed upstream are
> phonon-vlc and phonon-gstreamer. phonon-xine has not been updated or
> received bug fixes for ages.
By the way, I'll soon have a look at Phonon updates. Those might
Olivier Smedts writes:
> I've been a happy user of phonon-xine and libxine for quite some time,
> but with the update of libxine to 1.2.1, phonon-xine refuses to
> compile :
> ===>>> This port is marked BROKEN
> ===>>> deprecated upstream; refuses to build with libxine 1.2.x
>
> S
Hello,
I've been a happy user of phonon-xine and libxine for quite some time,
but with the update of libxine to 1.2.1, phonon-xine refuses to
compile :
===>>> This port is marked BROKEN
===>>> deprecated upstream; refuses to build with libxine 1.2.x
So, what is recommended for now