David Johnson wrote:
> On Monday 15 June 2009 02:22:27 pm martinko wrote:
>> That's what I was just thinking of.
>> Wouldn't it be better to rename kdebase4 to kdebase4-applications and
>> create kdebase4 metaport that would pull all kdebase4-* ports ?
>
> They're named what they are because that'
On Monday 15 June 2009 02:22:27 pm martinko wrote:
> That's what I was just thinking of.
> Wouldn't it be better to rename kdebase4 to kdebase4-applications and
> create kdebase4 metaport that would pull all kdebase4-* ports ?
They're named what they are because that's how KDE names its source tar
David Johnson wrote:
> On Monday 15 June 2009 02:14:38 pm martinko wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I installed kdebase4 the same way I did kdebase3. However, I realised I
>> cannot start the desktop with startkde[4]. The reason is that while it
>> used to be part of kdebase3 now it's part of kdebase4-wo
On Monday 15 June 2009 02:14:38 pm martinko wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I installed kdebase4 the same way I did kdebase3. However, I realised I
> cannot start the desktop with startkde[4]. The reason is that while it
> used to be part of kdebase3 now it's part of kdebase4-workspace.
> I don't know the
Hi list,
I installed kdebase4 the same way I did kdebase3. However, I realised I
cannot start the desktop with startkde[4]. The reason is that while it
used to be part of kdebase3 now it's part of kdebase4-workspace.
I don't know the reasons behind this but pkg-descr says "Installing this
pac