Re: [kde-freebsd] kde4 and fam

2009-09-12 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 12/09/2009 16:42 Dima Panov said the following: > On Saturday 12 September 2009 23:35:56 Martin Wilke wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 12:30:08PM +0200, Alberto Villa wrote: >>> On Saturday 12 September 2009 10:37:58 Andriy Gapon wrote: 2). maybe we could change the default method to FAM o

Re: [kde-freebsd] kde4 and fam

2009-09-12 Thread Dima Panov
On Saturday 12 September 2009 23:35:56 Martin Wilke wrote: > On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 12:30:08PM +0200, Alberto Villa wrote: > > On Saturday 12 September 2009 10:37:58 Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > 2). maybe we could change the default method to FAM or change default > > > polling interval to something

Re: [kde-freebsd] kde4 and fam

2009-09-12 Thread Alberto Villa
On Saturday 12 September 2009 14:35:56 Martin Wilke wrote: > > agreed: seeing a 50% cpu usage when starting your fresh kde is not what > > the casual user, which doesn't know about k...@freebsd wiki, would > > expect... > > Have fun with that. KDE is a lot slower with kde fam, and FreeBSD's fam is

Re: [kde-freebsd] kde4 and fam

2009-09-12 Thread Martin Wilke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 12:30:08PM +0200, Alberto Villa wrote: > On Saturday 12 September 2009 10:37:58 Andriy Gapon wrote: > > 2). maybe we could change the default method to FAM or change default > > polling interval to something greater or, at leas

Re: [kde-freebsd] kde4 and fam

2009-09-12 Thread Alberto Villa
On Saturday 12 September 2009 10:37:58 Andriy Gapon wrote: > 2). maybe we could change the default method to FAM or change default > polling interval to something greater or, at least, prominently notify > users - rescanning all directories every 0.5 seconds creates noticeable > CPU load. agree

Re: [kde-freebsd] kde4 and fam

2009-09-12 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 12/09/2009 06:47 Thomas Abthorpe said the following: > On September 11, 2009 07:49:12 am Andriy Gapon wrote: >> Is this still true? For FreeBSD specifically? > > I think this is old news. Somebody should fix that (tm> Thank you! Just a couple of notes: 1). I think that our port has a redundant

Re: [kde-freebsd] kde4 and fam

2009-09-12 Thread Martin Wilke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:47:46PM -0400, Thomas Abthorpe wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On September 11, 2009 07:49:12 am Andriy Gapon wrote: > > Is this still true? For FreeBSD specifically? > > I think this is old new

Re: [kde-freebsd] kde4 and fam

2009-09-11 Thread Thomas Abthorpe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On September 11, 2009 07:49:12 am Andriy Gapon wrote: > Is this still true? For FreeBSD specifically? I think this is old news. Somebody should fix that (tm> > > BTW, can KDirWatch be configured via GUI or only via editing kdedrc? Manual, i think.

[kde-freebsd] kde4 and fam

2009-09-11 Thread Andriy Gapon
http://wiki.freebsd.org/KDE4 > kdelibs > > * KDirWatch of kded4 defaults now to use polling (method "Stat") instead of > FAM. FAM support is currently broken on all platforms. Is this still true? For FreeBSD specifically? BTW, can KDirWatch be configured via GUI or only via editing kdedrc? Tha