Jason E. Hale wrote:
> I have actually submitted a PR (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-
> pr.cgi?pr=ports/131108) just over a week ago updating gpgme to 1.1.8 and
> offered to maintain it. gabor@ took the PR.
Here is what I hope to be the final version of this patch. If you're
happy with it I w
Gábor Kövesdán wrote:
> I don't know what .sig file do you refer
The PGP signature file for the source tarball.
> to but some time ago there was
> a discussion about such validations on po...@. There was a diff for
> bsd.port.mk to add such checks and it has been never committed but some
> people
Greetings, Sticky Bit!
On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 11:34:44 +0100, You wrote:
(stickybit == Sticky Bit)
stickybit> On Saturday 07 February 2009 03:47:16 Doug Barton wrote:
stickybit> > Dima Panov wrote:
stickybit> > > The new gpgme builds fine with pth. Sticky Bit, update your pth
>
> D'oh! I always forget to check the PR database. I have no objections
> to you maintaining the port. I would like you to consider some of the
> changes I added though, especially downloading (and optionally
> verifying) the .sig file, and making the gpg version optional. I don't
> think we shou
Greetings, Doug Barton!
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 12:21:05 -0800, You wrote:
(dougb == Doug Barton)
dougb> > -- Forwarded Message --
dougb> > On Thursday 05 February 2009 21:27:11 Doug Barton wrote:
dougb> >> The attached patch upgrades gpgme to version 1.1.8. S
Greetings, Doug Barton!
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 18:47:16 -0800, You wrote:
(dougb == Doug Barton)
dougb> > dougb> > On Thursday 05 February 2009 21:27:11 Doug Barton wrote:
dougb> > dougb> >> The attached patch upgrades gpgme to version 1.1.8. Since
the kde
dougb> > dougb> >>
On Saturday 07 February 2009 03:47:16 Doug Barton wrote:
> Dima Panov wrote:
> > The new gpgme builds fine with pth. Sticky Bit, update your pth package
> > at first, please.
I have _always_ up to date ports installed! And of course my installed pth
port was and is up to date!
Please do not assu
On Saturday 07 February 2009 01:48:41 you wrote:
> D'oh! I always forget to check the PR database. I have no objections
> to you maintaining the port. I would like you to consider some of the
> changes I added though, especially downloading (and optionally
> verifying) the .sig file, and making th
Jason E. Hale wrote:
> On Friday 06 February 2009 15:21:05 Doug Barton wrote:
The attached patch upgrades gpgme to version 1.1.8. Since the kde
components are the primary consumers of gpgme, I thought I'd ask y'all
first to give this a test run.
>
> I have actually submitted a PR (h
On Friday 06 February 2009 15:21:05 Doug Barton wrote:
> >> The attached patch upgrades gpgme to version 1.1.8. Since the kde
> >> components are the primary consumers of gpgme, I thought I'd ask y'all
> >> first to give this a test run.
I have actually submitted a PR (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/q
Dima Panov wrote:
>Greetings, Doug Barton!
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 12:21:05 -0800, You wrote:
> (dougb == Doug Barton)
>
> dougb> > -- Forwarded Message --
> dougb> > On Thursday 05 February 2009 21:27:11 Doug Barton wrote:
> dougb> >> The attached patch up
On Thursday 05 February 2009 21:27:11 Doug Barton wrote:
> The attached patch upgrades gpgme to version 1.1.8. Since the kde
> components are the primary consumers of gpgme, I thought I'd ask y'all
> first to give this a test run.
Thanks!
Unfortunately the port does not build with option 'pth' en
12 matches
Mail list logo
