On 03.05.11 21:56, Max Brazhnikov wrote:
> On Tue, 03 May 2011 20:14:12 +0200, Andreas Tobler wrote:
>> On 03.05.11 20:03, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
>>> Here is complete block.
>>>
>>> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5335 @ 2.00GHz (1995.04-MHz K8-class
>>> CPU)
>>> Origin = "GenuineIntel" I
Max Brazhnikov píše v út 03. 05. 2011 v 23:56 +0400:
> On Tue, 03 May 2011 20:14:12 +0200, Andreas Tobler wrote:
> > On 03.05.11 20:03, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > > Here is complete block.
> > >
> > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5335 @ 2.00GHz (1995.04-MHz
> > > K8-class CPU)
> > >Orig
On Tue, 03 May 2011 20:14:12 +0200, Andreas Tobler wrote:
> On 03.05.11 20:03, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > Here is complete block.
> >
> > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5335 @ 2.00GHz (1995.04-MHz K8-class
> > CPU)
> >Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6fb Family = 6 Model = f Stepping =
On 03.05.11 19:55, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> gohan61.FreeBSD.org is Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5335
> Features2=0x4e33d
What does Features say?
Here is mine:
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T5600 @ 1.83GHz (1828.79-MHz K8-class CPU)
Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6f2 Family = 6 Model = f Stepping = 2
On 03.05.11 18:22, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Great. Can you patch the port to pass these flags?
> Cc:ing port maintainer(s).
Right now I am not in the situation to do so.
I do not understand the configury. At least I think these CPU features
should have been auto detected, no?
Might it be that this
On 03.05.11 20:03, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Here is complete block.
>
> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5335 @ 2.00GHz (1995.04-MHz K8-class
> CPU)
>Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6fb Family = 6 Model = f Stepping = 11
>
> Features=0xbfebfbff
>Features2=0x4e33d
>AMD Feature
Here is complete block.
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5335 @ 2.00GHz (1995.04-MHz K8-class CPU)
Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6fb Family = 6 Model = f Stepping = 11
Features=0xbfebfbff
Features2=0x4e33d
AMD Features=0x20100800
AMD Features2=0x1
TSC: P-state invariant
A
gohan61.FreeBSD.org is Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5335
Features2=0x4e33d
Andreas Tobler píše v út 03. 05. 2011 v 19:53 +0200:
> On 03.05.11 18:22, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > Great. Can you patch the port to pass these flags?
> > Cc:ing port maintainer(s).
>
> Right now I am not in the situation to do s
Great. Can you patch the port to pass these flags?
Cc:ing port maintainer(s).
Andreas Tobler píše v út 03. 05. 2011 v 18:19 +0200:
> On 03.05.11 14:30, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > The last logfile with failure available
> >
> > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9.20110430054701
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> Is anyone able to reproduce this on -CURRENT?
george liaskos said that...
This should be resolved in r220630
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=220630
and i think it actually is
i'll try to reproduce it in tinder
Pav Lucistnik writes:
> pav 2011-05-01 22:58:49 UTC
>
> FreeBSD ports repository
>
> Modified files:
> x11-toolkits/qt4-gui Makefile
> Log:
> - Mark BROKEN on 9.X: does not compile
>
> image/qimage_ssse3.cpp:68: error: '__m128i' does not name a type
>
> Reported b
11 matches
Mail list logo