Op zaterdag 18 juni 2011 12:02:35 schreef u:
> On Wednesday 15 June 2011 11:06:09 Oliver Heesakkers wrote:
> > Slightly off-topic, but has anyone ever started a fork of kmail for
> > the sake 'light'-ness?
>
> ...and freedom from akonadi? (...)
> What is the rationale behind akonadi, anyway? (...)
Hi everyone,
another update on my experience:
1) Since the conversion of my local mail folder didn't work, I set it up
manually with akonadi-control-interface (just add KMAIl-maildir-
ressource and give ~/.kde4/share/apps/kmail/mail as path). That worked.
2) I removed the old IMAP, for which I ad
m...@chronos.org.uk said:
> Failing that, recommendations for a databaseless graphical mail
> client that can stick mailing list posts in a directory on receipt,
> does not honour receipt requests and web beacons, displays plain
> text only when I tell it to, works with SSL/TLS/MSA, has a workin
On Wednesday 15 June 2011 11:06:09 Oliver Heesakkers wrote:
> Slightly off-topic, but has anyone ever started a fork of kmail for
> the sake 'light'-ness?
...and freedom from akonadi? There seems to be some sort of "let's
have a database or nine" theme going with KDE4. I have to include a
shutdo
Am Dienstag, 14. Juni 2011, 12:16:15 schrieb Alberto Villa:
> While KDE SC 4.6.4 makes his debut in the ports tree, we decided not
> to push KDE PIM 4.6.0, and keep the stable 4.4.11.1 a little longer.
> Nonetheless, we encourage you all brave people (well, it’s stable
> software, you don’t really
Op dinsdag 14 juni 2011 12:16:15 schreef Alberto Villa:
> While KDE SC 4.6.4 makes his debut in the ports tree, we decided not to
> push KDE PIM 4.6.0, and keep the stable 4.4.11.1 a little longer.
> Nonetheless, we encourage you all brave people (well, itâs stable
> software, you donât real
