On Monday 16 April 2012 20:27:33 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> By the way, is llvm a valid compiler that deserves an mkspec? I thought
> people were supposed to use only clang.
freebsd-llvm removed in area51 r8130.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freeb
2012/4/17 Raphael Kubo da Costa :
> Olivier Smedts writes:
>> Still the same problem with Qt 4.8.1 and clang :
>> after checking out the latest area51 and kdemerge -kmpq, I "portmaster
>> \*qt4\*" (last time I tried with "portmaster -a" but before I had to
>> delete some KDE ports like specified i
Olivier Smedts writes:
> 2012/4/3 Alberto Villa :
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Olivier Smedts wrote:
>>> Are there any recommendations to compile Qt 4.8.0 (from area51) with
>>> clang ? I set up my /etc/make.conf as usual for clang, it worked
>>> perfectly with Qt 4.7 (except qt4-webkit)
2012/4/3 Alberto Villa :
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Olivier Smedts wrote:
>> Are there any recommendations to compile Qt 4.8.0 (from area51) with
>> clang ? I set up my /etc/make.conf as usual for clang, it worked
>> perfectly with Qt 4.7 (except qt4-webkit) but now where trying ti
>> "po
2012/4/3 Alberto Villa :
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Olivier Smedts wrote:
>> Are there any recommendations to compile Qt 4.8.0 (from area51) with
>> clang ? I set up my /etc/make.conf as usual for clang, it worked
>> perfectly with Qt 4.7 (except qt4-webkit) but now where trying ti
>> "po
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> Are there any recommendations to compile Qt 4.8.0 (from area51) with
> clang ? I set up my /etc/make.conf as usual for clang, it worked
> perfectly with Qt 4.7 (except qt4-webkit) but now where trying ti
> "portmaster -a" :
Last time I tri
Hello,
Are there any recommendations to compile Qt 4.8.0 (from area51) with
clang ? I set up my /etc/make.conf as usual for clang, it worked
perfectly with Qt 4.7 (except qt4-webkit) but now where trying ti
"portmaster -a" :
===> Configuring for qt4-rcc-4.8.0
/usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|target.pat
