Re: [kde-freebsd] [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted

2009-01-10 Thread Dorian Büttner
On Sunday 11 January 2009 00:00:03 Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Dorian Büttner wrote: > > On Saturday 10 January 2009 21:03:55 Garrett Cooper wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Matt wrote: > >> > On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Phil Oleson wrote: > >> >> I

Re: [kde-freebsd] [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted

2009-01-10 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Dorian Büttner wrote: > On Saturday 10 January 2009 21:03:55 Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Matt wrote: >> > On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Phil Oleson wrote: >> >> I did run into a linking issue with the build of...errr kdebase, >> >

Re: [kde-freebsd] [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted

2009-01-10 Thread Dorian Büttner
On Saturday 10 January 2009 21:03:55 Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Matt wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Phil Oleson wrote: > >> I did run into a linking issue with the build of...errr kdebase, > >> kdebase-runtime, or kdebase-workspace.. I cant remember now.

Re: [kde-freebsd] [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted

2009-01-10 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Matt wrote: > On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Phil Oleson wrote: >> I did run into a linking issue with the build of...errr kdebase, >> kdebase-runtime, or kdebase-workspace.. I cant remember now.. but the >> issue was with hspell. I had to rebuild it with this

Re: [kde-freebsd] [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted

2009-01-10 Thread Matt
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Phil Oleson wrote: > I did run into a linking issue with the build of...errr kdebase, > kdebase-runtime, or kdebase-workspace.. I cant remember now.. but the > issue was with hspell. I had to rebuild it with this patch: > > --- Makefile.orig 2009-01-04 05:20:

Re: [kde-freebsd] [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted

2009-01-10 Thread Dorian Büttner
Dorian Büttner schrieb: > Kris Moore schrieb: > >>> Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdelibs4. >>> >>> Am I supposed to remove this patch from files/? Its still in SVN if so. >>> >>> >>> >> Opps! My bad, the server was still pulling from the trunk in SVN, I'll >> change it to checkout the tag

Re: [kde-freebsd] [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted

2009-01-09 Thread David Naylor
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:40:39 you wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 06:10:43PM +0200, David Naylor wrote: > > On Wednesday 07 January 2009 00:06:42 you wrote: > > > We are happy to announce the first public Call for Testing > > > with KDE 4.2. > > > > > > The past weeks we focused on the com

Re: [kde-freebsd] [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted

2009-01-09 Thread Diego Depaoli
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Max Brazhnikov wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 01:42:36 +0100, Diego Depaoli wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Martin Wilke wrote: >> > We are happy to announce the first public Call for Testing >> > with KDE 4.2. >> >> kdepim4 stops building around 25% with k

Re: [kde-freebsd] [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted

2009-01-09 Thread Dorian Büttner
Phil Oleson schrieb: > > I did run into a linking issue with the build of...errr kdebase, > kdebase-runtime, or kdebase-workspace.. I cant remember now.. but the > issue was with hspell. I had to rebuild it with this patch: > > --- Makefile.orig 2009-01-04 05:20:09.0 + > +++ Ma

Re: [kde-freebsd] [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted

2009-01-09 Thread Phil Oleson
So I installed 4.1.85 from area51 last Sunday from the instructions listed there. Here is my general feedback from the process. I had installed a new Current amd64 image and had installed kde4 from ports initially.. but I decided on my own to try out the beta. I started with doing a pkg_delete /

Re: [kde-freebsd] [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted

2009-01-09 Thread Max Brazhnikov
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 01:39:40 -0800 (PST), Doug Barton wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Diego Depaoli wrote: ... > > Same here. > > For some obscure reason qt4-designer refuses to build through > > portmaster or portupgrade. > > cd ${PORTSDIR}/devel/qt4-designer && make... to go forward. > > Has anyone i

Re: [kde-freebsd] [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted

2009-01-09 Thread Doug Barton
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Diego Depaoli wrote: > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Andrey wrote: > >> I faced with the following issue while qt4-designer has been upgrading: >> >> --- --- >> >> [sil...@beastie][/usr/ports]sudo portupgrade -R 'qt4-*' >> +++ +++ >> Stop in >> /usr/ports/devel/qt4-design

Re: [kde-freebsd] [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted

2009-01-09 Thread Max Brazhnikov
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 01:42:36 +0100, Diego Depaoli wrote: > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Martin Wilke wrote: > > We are happy to announce the first public Call for Testing > > with KDE 4.2. > > kdepim4 stops building around 25% with kdepim-3.5.10 installed because > libkleo complains about undef

Re: [kde-freebsd] [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted

2009-01-08 Thread Diego Depaoli
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Martin Wilke wrote: > We are happy to announce the first public Call for Testing > with KDE 4.2. kdepim4 stops building around 25% with kdepim-3.5.10 installed because libkleo complains about undefined reference to QGpgME. Can someone confirm that? Regards -- Die

Re: [kde-freebsd] [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted

2009-01-07 Thread Andrey
Hello, Martin Wilke wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > We are happy to announce the first public Call for Testing > with KDE 4.2. > > The past weeks we focused on the complex and very time > consuming task to get the KDE4.2 BETA2 ports into a much > better shape so we c

Re: [kde-freebsd] [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted

2009-01-07 Thread Diego Depaoli
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Andrey wrote: > I faced with the following issue while qt4-designer has been upgrading: > > --- --- > > [sil...@beastie][/usr/ports]sudo portupgrade -R 'qt4-*' > +++ +++ > Stop in > /usr/ports/devel/qt4-designer/work/qt-x11-opensource-src-4.4.3/tools/designer. >

Re: [kde-freebsd] [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted

2009-01-07 Thread Dorian Büttner
Kris Moore schrieb: >> Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdelibs4. >> >> Am I supposed to remove this patch from files/? Its still in SVN if so. >> >> > > Opps! My bad, the server was still pulling from the trunk in SVN, I'll > change it to checkout the tag/4.1.85 this time and try again, since I > not

Re: [kde-freebsd] [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted

2009-01-07 Thread Kris Moore
Kris Moore wrote: > Martin Wilke wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> We are happy to announce the first public Call for Testing >> with KDE 4.2. >> >> The past weeks we focused on the complex and very time >> consuming task to get the KDE4.2 BETA2 ports into a much >> b

Re: [kde-freebsd] [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted

2009-01-07 Thread Kris Moore
Martin Wilke wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > We are happy to announce the first public Call for Testing > with KDE 4.2. > > The past weeks we focused on the complex and very time > consuming task to get the KDE4.2 BETA2 ports into a much > better shape so we can now g

Re: [kde-freebsd] [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted

2009-01-07 Thread Max Brazhnikov
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:06:42 +0100, Martin Wilke wrote: > We are happy to announce the first public Call for Testing > with KDE 4.2. > > The past weeks we focused on the complex and very time > consuming task to get the KDE4.2 BETA2 ports into a much > better shape so we can now go on to the next st

Re: [kde-freebsd] [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted

2009-01-06 Thread David Johnson
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 02:06:42 pm Martin Wilke wrote: > We are happy to announce the first public Call for Testing > with KDE 4.2. I should be able to find time this weekend to bang on the ports. I would have done more earlier, but the holidays ate up my spare time. -- David Johnson __

[kde-freebsd] [CFT] KDE 4.2 BETA 2 testers wanted

2009-01-06 Thread Martin Wilke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 We are happy to announce the first public Call for Testing with KDE 4.2. The past weeks we focused on the complex and very time consuming task to get the KDE4.2 BETA2 ports into a much better shape so we can now go on to the next step: much wider publ