https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277204
--- Comment #5 from Gleb Popov ---
(In reply to Benjamin Takacs from comment #4)
There are several concepts interleaved here, let me explain.
* Feature is a sort of OPTION but general enough to be applied to **any** port.
DEBUG is an examp
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277204
--- Comment #4 from Benjamin Takacs ---
(In reply to Gleb Popov from comment #2)
As features are still loaded in the post section of bsd.port.mk, I don't see
how it would help these ports to detect if ccache support is enabled. By
allowing
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277204
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Andree ---
Gleb, thanks for looking at rawtherapee. I have 5.10 cooking, test compiles on
the off-versions got delayed due to the usual rust rebuild madness (because the
upstream package for 13.2 wasn't up to da
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277204
Gleb Popov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ports-b...@freebsd.org |port...@freebsd.org
--
You are recei
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277204
Gleb Popov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arr...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #2 fro
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277204
Matthias Andree changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||port...@freebsd.org
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277204
Bug ID: 277204
Summary: *: ports misusing WITH_CCACHE_BUILD and NO_CCACHE
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
