https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235215
--- Comment #12 from Jan Beich ---
(In reply to Tatsuki Makino from comment #11)
Nothing. USES=compiler is mostly nop on aarch64/amd64/armv6/armv7/i386 after
FreeBSD < 11.2 EOL. See also bug 230790.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235215
Tatsuki Makino changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tatsuki_mak...@hotmail.com
--- Co
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235240
Bernhard Froehlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|maintainer-feedback?(decke@ |maintainer-feedback+
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235240
Yuri Victorovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|maintainer-feedback?(yuri@f |maintainer-feedback+
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234917
Tobias C. Berner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235240
Tobias C. Berner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|maintainer-feedback?(kde@Fr |maintainer-feedback+
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235240
Alexandre C. Guimarães changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|maintainer-feedback?(rigole |maintainer-feedback+
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 10:15 AM Tobias C. Berner wrote:
>
> Hi Fernando
>
> Did you rebuild qt5* and basic256 after r490472?
No,I didn't. I'm dealing with packages here.
I pkg upgraded and now the program runs. I somehow thought the
installation of lang/basic256 would require the upgrade of the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235093
Tobias C. Berner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |In Progress
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235240
Guido Falsi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|maintainer-feedback?(madpil |maintainer-feedback+
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235232
Tobias C. Berner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|In Progress |Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235232
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Omelchuk ---
(In reply to Tobias C. Berner from comment #4)
Оf course is updated, but I just now rebild all installed “kf5” ports, and now
okular build without errors!
Thanks!
PR can be closed.
--
You are rec
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235240
Jan Beich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|sunp...@freebsd.org |port...@freebsd.org
Flags
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235240
Bug ID: 235240
Summary: devel/libinotify: move sys/inotify.h into a
subdirectory
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Jan Beich has asked k...@freebsd.org for
maintainer-feedback:
Bug 235240: devel/libinotify: move sys/inotify.h into a subdirectory
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235240
--- Description ---
libinotify installs sys/inotify.h in a common location where regular libraries
are. Con
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235232
--- Comment #4 from Tobias C. Berner ---
Also x11-toolkits/kf5-kxmlgui and the other kf5 portS?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235232
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Omelchuk ---
(In reply to Tobias C. Berner from comment #2)
Оf course, everything is updated ...
root@vladiom:~ # pkg version -v | grep qt
avidemux-qt4-2.6.11_8 = up-to-date with index
eric6-qt5
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235232
Tobias C. Berner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |In Progress
Flags|
Hi Fernando
Did you rebuild qt5* and basic256 after r490472?
mfg Tobias
On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 at 10:03, Fernando Apesteguía
wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I was testing some changes to lang/basic256 from PR 235204 and I
> realized the port is broken at run time with this error:
>
> ld-elf.so.1: /usr/loc
Hi there!
I was testing some changes to lang/basic256 from PR 235204 and I
realized the port is broken at run time with this error:
ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/qt5/libQt5SerialPort.so.5: Undefined
symbol "_ZN16QIODevicePrivate13putCharHelperEc@Qt_5_PRIVATE_API"
I don't know exactly when or why t
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235215
--- Comment #10 from Jan Beich ---
Tier2 cannot block progress: no automation, emulation bugs, real machines
oversubscribed and disabled pkg-fallout@ mail. How exactly waiting until after
LLVM release would help?
(In reply to Mark Linimon
Bugzilla Automation has asked k...@freebsd.org for
maintainer-feedback:
Bug 235232: graphics/okular 18.12.1_2: Doesn't build: c++: error: linker
command failed
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235232
--- Description ---
Part of log:
[…]
FAILED: shell/okular
: && /usr/local/lib
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235232
Vladimir Omelchuk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ad...@vladiom.com.ua
Attachmen
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235232
Bug ID: 235232
Summary: graphics/okular 18.12.1_2: Doesn't build: c++: error:
linker command failed
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235215
--- Comment #9 from Mark Linimon ---
(In reply to Mark Linimon from comment #8)
http://beefy8.nyi.freebsd.org/data/head-armv6-default/p491221_s343459/logs/errors/llvm80-8.0.0.r1.log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235215
--- Comment #8 from Mark Linimon ---
llvm80 is so new that it has not even built yet on any tier-2 arch; in fact, it
has only just now built on amd64.
Until llvm80 has had a bit more soak-time this push is too agressive IMHO.
--
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235215
Tobias Kortkamp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|maintainer-feedback?(tobik@ |maintainer-feedback+
29 matches
Mail list logo
