Synopsis: deskutils/kdepim4 fails to link with libinotify (and also kdepim44)
State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: avilla
State-Changed-When: Sat Aug 25 01:43:07 UTC 2012
State-Changed-Why:
Checks for inotify.h were removed. The reason is explained in the commit
message which
The following reply was made to PR ports/170209; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: dfil...@freebsd.org (dfilter service)
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/170209: commit references a PR
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 01:38:48 + (UTC)
Author: avilla
Date: Sat Aug 25 01:38:34 2012
SVN commit 8563 by avilla:
- Merge ^/trunk/area51.
- Revert r8554.
PR: 170209
_M. (directory)
M +2 -4 KDE/deskutils/kdepim4/Makefile
M +9 -12 KDE/deskutils/kdepim4/files/patch-messageviewer__CMakeLists.txt
M +2 -4 KDE/deskutils/kdepim44/Makefil
SVN commit 8562 by avilla:
- Remove check for inotify.h.
PR: 170209
A patch-messageviewer__CMakeLists.txt
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://f
SVN commit 8561 by avilla:
- Revert r8555 (force dependency on libinotify).
- Remove check for inotify.h to avoid possible detection.
A dependency on libinotify can't be a good thing yet, as the code uses
an event which is still unsupported by devel/libinotify.
PR: 170209
M +2 -4
Raphael Kubo da Costa writes:
> We (kde@) would like to ask for an exp-run for the recently-released
> CMake 2.8.9.
> A patch can be fetched from
> http://people.freebsd.org/~rakuco/exp-runs/cmake-2.8.9-v1.diff
New patch with some plist adjustments:
http://people.freebsd.org/~rakuco/exp-runs/cma
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:53 PM, ajtiM wrote:
> I rebuilt all three *without* debug flags and it work very good :).
That's what I was waiting for. Thank you!
--
Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla
___
kde-freebsd mailing
On Friday 24 August 2012 05:36:16 Alberto Villa wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:28 PM, ajtiM wrote:
> > Thank you very much for the help. I rebuilt opengtl and qtgtl with gcc
> > and everything works now :). Is it possible that I had a problem because
> > opengtl and qtgtl was built with clang
SVN commit 8560 by jhale:
Merge ^/trunk/area51:r8557-8559
_M. (directory)
M +12 -13PORTS/devel/cmake/pkg-plist
M +5 -5 PORTS/math/eigen3/Makefile
M +2 -2 PORTS/math/eigen3/distinfo
M +1 -0 PORTS/math/eigen3/pkg-plist
__
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:28 PM, ajtiM wrote:
> Thank you very much for the help. I rebuilt opengtl and qtgtl with gcc and
> everything works now :). Is it possible that I had a problem because opengtl
> and qtgtl was built with clang?
I thought OpenGTL and QtGTL weren't even buildable with Clan
On Thursday 23 August 2012 17:51:45 Alberto Villa wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:40 PM, ajtiM wrote:
> > I hope that bactraces would be helpful.
>
> Can you also rebuild opengtl and qtgtl with debug symbols and generate
> a new backtrace?
Thank you very much for the help. I rebuilt opengtl
11 matches
Mail list logo
