Re: [kde-freebsd] kde4 upgrade

2012-07-06 Thread joaoBR
Em Thu, 5 Jul 2012 17:13:44 -0300 joaoBR escreveu: > Em Thu, 05 Jul 2012 14:36:07 -0500 > Rusty Nejdl escreveu: > > > On 2012-07-05 13:54, joaoBR wrote: > > > Em Thu, 05 Jul 2012 13:16:46 -0500 > > > Rusty Nejdl escreveu: > > > > > >> On 2012-07-05 05:20, joaoBR wrote: > > >> > Em Tue, 03 Jul

Re: [kde-freebsd] kde4 upgrade

2012-07-06 Thread joaoBR
Em Fri, 6 Jul 2012 12:47:55 +0200 Olivier Smedts escreveu: > 2012/7/6 joaoBR : > > Em Fri, 6 Jul 2012 00:45:38 +0200 > > Alberto Villa escreveu: > > > >> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 7:43 PM, joaoBR wrote: > >> > Em Tue, 3 Jul 2012 08:11:08 -0300 > >> > joaoBR escreveu: > >> > > >> >> qt4/files/make

Re: [kde-freebsd] kde4 upgrade

2012-07-06 Thread joaoBR
Em Fri, 6 Jul 2012 13:31:24 +0200 Alberto Villa escreveu: > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:21 PM, joaoBR wrote: > > great, that is what I am saying > > > > the related question in my first msg was: HOW do you guys do it? > > portmaster -a. ok, I'll give it a try on another machine on monday for me

Re: [kde-freebsd] kde4 upgrade

2012-07-06 Thread Olivier Smedts
2012/7/6 joaoBR : > corrupted, yoo... question is who and what :) Don't know... again : I don't know how you update your ports tree, if you switched for example from csup to portsnap, if you sometimes apply patches to your ports tree, if you use area51... Maybe if you told us what you mean by "man

Re: [kde-freebsd] kde4 upgrade

2012-07-06 Thread Alberto Villa
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:02 PM, joaoBR wrote: > keep talking > > # $FreeBSD: ports/x11-toolkits/qt4-gui/Makefile,v 1.44 2012/07/04 > 17:46:22 avilla Exp $ > > corrupted, yoo... question is who and what :) then i guess it was a > ghost who put this line into the Makefile? You miss the point: that

Re: [kde-freebsd] kde4 upgrade

2012-07-06 Thread joaoBR
Em Fri, 6 Jul 2012 13:32:44 +0200 Alberto Villa escreveu: > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:23 PM, joaoBR wrote: > > well, qt-gui just got an upgrade and the above file was pulled in > > by it > > > > now the problem is gone > > This explains everything. You have a corrupted ports tree. keep talking

Re: [kde-freebsd] kde4 upgrade

2012-07-06 Thread Alberto Villa
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Olivier Smedts wrote: > As someone suggested, can the problem be caused by a corrupted ports > tree ? It is, for sure. -- Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla ___ kde-freebsd mailing list

Re: [kde-freebsd] kde4 upgrade

2012-07-06 Thread Alberto Villa
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:23 PM, joaoBR wrote: > well, qt-gui just got an upgrade and the above file was pulled in by it > > now the problem is gone This explains everything. You have a corrupted ports tree. -- Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla _

Re: [kde-freebsd] kde4 upgrade

2012-07-06 Thread Alberto Villa
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:21 PM, joaoBR wrote: > great, that is what I am saying > > the related question in my first msg was: HOW do you guys do it? portmaster -a. -- Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla ___ kde-freebsd

Re: [kde-freebsd] kde4 upgrade

2012-07-06 Thread Olivier Smedts
2012/7/6 joaoBR : > Em Fri, 6 Jul 2012 00:45:38 +0200 > Alberto Villa escreveu: > >> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 7:43 PM, joaoBR wrote: >> > Em Tue, 3 Jul 2012 08:11:08 -0300 >> > joaoBR escreveu: >> > >> >> qt4/files/makefile.options, which needs to be manipulated manually >> >> otherwise a lot of d

Re: [kde-freebsd] kde4 upgrade

2012-07-06 Thread joaoBR
Em Fri, 6 Jul 2012 00:45:38 +0200 Alberto Villa escreveu: > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 7:43 PM, joaoBR wrote: > > Em Tue, 3 Jul 2012 08:11:08 -0300 > > joaoBR escreveu: > > > >> qt4/files/makefile.options, which needs to be manipulated manually > >> otherwise a lot of dependencies are mixed and fuc

Re: [kde-freebsd] kde4 upgrade

2012-07-06 Thread joaoBR
Em Fri, 6 Jul 2012 00:48:04 +0200 Alberto Villa escreveu: > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 9:17 PM, joaoBR wrote: > > and that is the reason WHY `portupgrade -a` is not working for the > > kde4 upgrade, because it IS necessary to proceed in a certain order > > for not being caught by this problem > > p