On 24/01/2008, David Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 24 January 2008 03:38:55 am David Naylor wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Now that there are three proposed cmake implementations for Mk, is it
> > not time to choose one? Ideally it would be best to choose the one
> > that is the most ro
Synopsis: multimedia/kdemultimedia: kmix - XF86RaiseVolume, XF86LowerVolume,
XF86AudioMute don't work
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: arved
State-Changed-When: Thu Jan 24 19:33:02 UTC 2008
State-Changed-Why:
Submitter reports, that the issue is resolved
http://www.freebsd.
On Thursday 24 January 2008 03:38:55 am David Naylor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now that there are three proposed cmake implementations for Mk, is it
> not time to choose one? Ideally it would be best to choose the one
> that is the most robust and flexable solution.
Yours is well commented and easy to und
The following reply was made to PR ports/107505; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Jonathan Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/107505: multimedia/kdemultimedia: kmix - XF86RaiseVolume,
XF86LowerVolume, XF86AudioMute don't work
D
Hi,
Now that there are three proposed cmake implementations for Mk, is it
not time to choose one? Ideally it would be best to choose the one
that is the most robust and flexable solution.
Would a list of advantages and disadvantages for each proposal be
beneficial (and possibly, with work to eli
I have seen a few ports that need to include -lpthreads. The one I
worked on was ksudoku, but when I removed pthreads it still compiled
and ran. So my questions:
1) Why is pthreads an issue and,
2) Has this issue been solved in RELENG_7 (or cmakes)
(Shouldn't there be a USE_PTHREADS)
Thanks
D
