Hello,
On Wednesday 21 August 2013 10:41:06 Hugo Pereira Da Costa wrote:
> On 08/20/2013 10:31 PM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > My understanding of the current situation is that:
> > a) the current KStyle is overengineered and does way too much;
>
> yes.
>
> > b) we need a KStyle to enforce some
On 08/20/2013 10:31 PM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
Hello,
On Tuesday 20 August 2013 21:27:52 Hugo Pereira Da Costa wrote:
There is some traffic on the frameworks list concerning implementing new
features in kstyle.
It might be useful to mention that the current oxygen code (KDE's
default widget style)
Hello,
On Tuesday 20 August 2013 21:27:52 Hugo Pereira Da Costa wrote:
> There is some traffic on the frameworks list concerning implementing new
> features in kstyle.
> It might be useful to mention that the current oxygen code (KDE's
> default widget style) derives from QCommonStyle and not ksty
On 08/20/2013 09:45 PM, Christoph Feck wrote:
On Tuesday 20 August 2013 21:27:52 Hugo Pereira Da Costa wrote:
Hi All,
There is some traffic on the frameworks list concerning
implementing new features in kstyle.
It might be useful to mention that the current oxygen code (KDE's
default widget sty
On Tuesday 20 August 2013 21:27:52 Hugo Pereira Da Costa wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> There is some traffic on the frameworks list concerning
> implementing new features in kstyle.
> It might be useful to mention that the current oxygen code (KDE's
> default widget style) derives from QCommonStyle and not
Hi All,
There is some traffic on the frameworks list concerning implementing new
features in kstyle.
It might be useful to mention that the current oxygen code (KDE's
default widget style) derives from QCommonStyle and not kstyle, so that
none of the modifications to KStyle will be available t
