---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126047/
---
(Updated Nov. 13, 2015, 2:24 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
> On Nov. 13, 2015, 7:59 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > shouldn't we just delete the code? Qt nowadays does SNI and if not we have
> > the xembed-sni-proxy. Thoughts on that? Maybe bound to the Qt version which
> > introduced the SNI support?
>
> David Edmundson wrote:
> Could do.
> I
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126047/#review88327
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Martin Gräßlin
On Nov. 12, 2015, 8:24
> On Nov. 13, 2015, 6:59 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > shouldn't we just delete the code? Qt nowadays does SNI and if not we have
> > the xembed-sni-proxy. Thoughts on that? Maybe bound to the Qt version which
> > introduced the SNI support?
Could do.
I've not tried Qt's version of SNI mysel
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126047/#review88310
---
shouldn't we just delete the code? Qt nowadays does SNI and if
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126047/#review88306
---
+1
- Martin Klapetek
On Nov. 12, 2015, 8:24 p.m., David Edm
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126047/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Martin Gräßlin.
Repository: framewo
