---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112896/#review43888
---
This review has been submitted with commit
d981e6e6be947a3e977
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112896/
---
(Updated Nov. 18, 2013, 1:21 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112896/
---
(Updated Nov. 8, 2013, 4:14 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Cha
> On Sept. 26, 2013, 2:27 a.m., Fredrik Höglund wrote:
> > I'm just going to point out something I know you already know since we've
> > discussed it many times;
> > that an xcb port of the NETWM classes already exists in a branch.
>
> Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> my aim was to write the unit te
> On Sept. 26, 2013, 2:27 a.m., Fredrik Höglund wrote:
> > I'm just going to point out something I know you already know since we've
> > discussed it many times;
> > that an xcb port of the NETWM classes already exists in a branch.
>
> Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> my aim was to write the unit te
> On Sept. 26, 2013, 2:27 a.m., Fredrik Höglund wrote:
> > I'm just going to point out something I know you already know since we've
> > discussed it many times;
> > that an xcb port of the NETWM classes already exists in a branch.
>
> Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> my aim was to write the unit te
> On Sept. 26, 2013, 4:27 a.m., Fredrik Höglund wrote:
> > I'm just going to point out something I know you already know since we've
> > discussed it many times;
> > that an xcb port of the NETWM classes already exists in a branch.
>
> Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> my aim was to write the unit te
> On Sept. 26, 2013, 2:27 a.m., Fredrik Höglund wrote:
> > I'm just going to point out something I know you already know since we've
> > discussed it many times;
> > that an xcb port of the NETWM classes already exists in a branch.
>
> Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> my aim was to write the unit te
> On Sept. 26, 2013, 4:27 a.m., Fredrik Höglund wrote:
> > I'm just going to point out something I know you already know since we've
> > discussed it many times;
> > that an xcb port of the NETWM classes already exists in a branch.
my aim was to write the unit test and that was the big junk of
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112896/#review40840
---
I'm just going to point out something I know you already know s
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112896/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Description
---
This is a patch se
11 matches
Mail list logo
