On Tuesday 08 April 2014 22:25:48 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> Hi all,
>
> > On Thursday 03 April 2014 09:50:24 Jos Poortvliet wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 19 March 2014 10:41:15 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM, K
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Hello,
Hi all,
>
> On Thursday 03 April 2014 09:50:24 Jos Poortvliet wrote:
>> On Wednesday 19 March 2014 10:41:15 Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
>> > > Hello,
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > > On Monda
On Wednesday 19 March 2014 10:41:15 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> Hi,
>
> > On Monday 17 March 2014 22:53:25 Mario Fux KDE ML wrote:
> >> Am Montag, 17. März 2014, 18.15:09 schrieb Kevin Ottens:
> >> > Porting Aids:
> >> > * kde4suppor
Hello,
On Thursday 03 April 2014 09:50:24 Jos Poortvliet wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 March 2014 10:41:15 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > > Hello,
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > On Monday 17 March 2014 22:53:25 Mario Fux KDE ML wrote:
> > >> Am Montag, 17. Mä
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Hello,
Hi,
>
> On Monday 17 March 2014 22:53:25 Mario Fux KDE ML wrote:
>> Am Montag, 17. März 2014, 18.15:09 schrieb Kevin Ottens:
>> > Porting Aids:
>> > * kde4support (obvious);
>>
>> Just that it doesn't get forgotten I'd like to second
Hello,
On Monday 17 March 2014 22:53:25 Mario Fux KDE ML wrote:
> Am Montag, 17. März 2014, 18.15:09 schrieb Kevin Ottens:
> > Porting Aids:
> > * kde4support (obvious);
>
> Just that it doesn't get forgotten I'd like to second Aarons (or who it was)
> proposal to rename kde4support to kdelibs4s
On 17/03/14 18:50, Treeve Jelbert wrote:
> On Monday 17 March 2014 18:15:09 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Now, the last point... What else do we want to move from KDE Frameworks to
>> KDE Porting Aids? Aleix and Aaron proposed the following content for KDE
>> Porting Aids:
>> * kde4support (obvious);
>>
Am Montag, 17. März 2014, 18.15:09 schrieb Kevin Ottens:
> Hello,
Morning Kevin
> Thanks for the feedback!
Thanks for your coordination!
[snip]
> Now, the last point... What else do we want to move from KDE Frameworks to
> KDE Porting Aids? Aleix and Aaron proposed the following content for KD
On 17 March 2014 16:45, Alex Merry wrote:
> On 17/03/14 15:25, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
>> What worries me with this approach is it feels like comparing apples and
>> oranges here. To me a framework "tier" is about its dependencies, not
>> about its maturity. I would suggest to instead introduce an
On Monday 17 March 2014 18:15:09 Kevin Ottens wrote:
Now, the last point... What else do we want to move from KDE Frameworks to
> KDE Porting Aids? Aleix and Aaron proposed the following content for KDE
> Porting Aids:
> * kde4support (obvious);
> * khtml (planned for a long time);
> * kjs (bec
On 17/03/14 17:15, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Now, the last point... What else do we want to move from KDE Frameworks to
> KDE
> Porting Aids? Aleix and Aaron proposed the following content for KDE Porting
> Aids:
> * kde4support (obvious);
> * khtml (planned for a long time);
> * kjs (because of
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for the feedback!
>
> Adding kde-promo in CC since it might have implications on future
> communication.
>
> On Saturday 15 March 2014 16:59:54 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > Here are the different options, they're clearly not mutually exclusive.
> >
> > 1) Split Tier 4 in a Tier 4
Hello,
Thanks for the feedback!
Adding kde-promo in CC since it might have implications on future
communication.
On Saturday 15 March 2014 16:59:54 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Here are the different options, they're clearly not mutually exclusive.
>
> 1) Split Tier 4 in a Tier 4 and a Tier Deprecate
On 17/03/14 15:25, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014, at 8:59, Kevin Ottens wrote:
>> 1) Split Tier 4 in a Tier 4 and a Tier Deprecated :)
>> Currently we can consider Tier 4 as badly defined. It contains both parts
>> with
>> no API (apidox, frameworkintegration, kfileaudiopreview) ma
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014, at 8:59, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> 1) Split Tier 4 in a Tier 4 and a Tier Deprecated :)
> Currently we can consider Tier 4 as badly defined. It contains both parts
> with
> no API (apidox, frameworkintegration, kfileaudiopreview) mainly for
> integration between frameworks and p
On Saturday, March 15, 2014 16:59:54 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> we would be releasing 5.0 with modules which would be immediately
> deprecated.
the modules that i am aware of include:
* kde4support
* khtml
* kjs
* kjsembed
* krunner
there are a few others that are imho borderline cases (kmediaplay
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 11:43:12 David Faure wrote:
> There's a middle ground between "actively maintain" and "we made it
> completely impossible to even fix one bug".
at which point the person(s) doing the bug fixes can take on the project an
handle releases. it is free software: people can fo
On Saturday 15 March 2014 16:59:54 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> This week, Aaron brought to my attention (thx!) that we would be releasing
> 5.0 with modules which would be immediately deprecated. Indeed that's a
> potential maintenance and messaging problem.
Do you have a list of such mo
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> This week, Aaron brought to my attention (thx!) that we would be releasing
> 5.0
> with modules which would be immediately deprecated. Indeed that's a
> potential
> maintenance and messaging problem.
> Also, to make things wors
19 matches
Mail list logo
