On Friday 27 December 2013 19:54:14 Àlex Fiestas wrote:
> On Friday 27 December 2013 19:00:14 Aleix Pol wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I've been going through the kde4support forward includes, since I wanted
> > to
> > start making the modules I decided we'd better make sure all of them are
> > working properl
On Friday 27 December 2013 19:00:14 Aleix Pol wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been going through the kde4support forward includes, since I wanted to
> start making the modules I decided we'd better make sure all of them are
> working properly.
>
> After some research, I found that I don't have these available
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Ivan Čukić wrote:
>
> > The above is pretty much it on my side, but I'd like to add something:
> > We should get those forwarding includes generated to not have to maintain
>
> Lets bring this topic back from the dead.
>
> I don't have a real preference between i
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Friday 18 October 2013 20:24:00 Aleix Pol wrote:
> > I realized recently that we have a weird setup for those CamelCased
> > includes that now we keep in kdelibs/includes, so I was guessing that
> > probably we want to split th
> The above is pretty much it on my side, but I'd like to add something:
> We should get those forwarding includes generated to not have to maintain
Lets bring this topic back from the dead.
I don't have a real preference between include/Module, include/KDE/Module and
include/KF5/Module.
Main
Hello,
On Friday 18 October 2013 20:24:00 Aleix Pol wrote:
> I realized recently that we have a weird setup for those CamelCased
> includes that now we keep in kdelibs/includes, so I was guessing that
> probably we want to split them and move them into each directory.
I think we want those instal
