Hi Shaheed!
The year is nearing its end, and I wonder if there has been any progress
and/or if you people need help with the bindings!
I’d really like to revive my IPython console in Kate :D
Best, Philipp
Shaheed Haque schrieb am Sa., 13. Jan. 2018 um
19:06 Uhr:
> Thanks to some upstream fixe
Hi Shaheed, Chris,
Shaheed Haque schrieb am Sa., 4. Nov. 2017 um
18:35 Uhr:
> FWIW, I already tried that (types.ModuleType is itself a perfectly
> subclassable class!) […]
>
> Now, none of that may be a limiting factor in the plan you seem to be
> discussing, but it was part of what made me thin
Hi Shaheed,
Thank you for the clarifications!
My observation is that *nobody* is likely to help with that problem: the
> framework owners did
> nothing obvious to either keep PyKDE4 going (out of tree) or to help
> Steve with my earlier SIP based efforts (in tree).
>
It's a bit sad, but not too
Hi Wim!
So now I have a (C++) namespace 'A' that bears no relationship to anything
> to do with the file system or any type of Python packaging: it exists only
> in memory for the duration of the python session.
>
Yeah, cool, so we just use a path hook and are ready to go right?
https://www.pyth
Hi Shaheed,
Shaheed Haque schrieb am Fr., 3. Nov. 2017 um
14:16 Uhr:
> Philipp,
>
> - my overall understanding of this technique is that it may end up
> being fragile, especially given the difference between P2 and P3.
>
Python 2? I’m sure we shouldn’t include into our decision making an
obsole
Hi Shaheed,
Thank you so much for all your work!
a framework-by-framework integration of the binding generation logic (as
> previously pioneered by Steve) probably cannot work in general because
> there are cases where multiple frameworks contribute to to the same C++
> namespace […]
>
> The prob
