ratijas added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
> ngraham wrote in ExpandableListItem.qml:269
> It was nothing more than a bad API design decision on my part.
Luckily, it is easily fixable, with an alias for backward compatibility.
However, I don't know how to enforce deprecation warnings on ali
ngraham added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
> ratijas wrote in ExpandableListItem.qml:269
> Why simply Item::enabled wasn't enough? Is there a real use-case that
> justifies an extra property with overlapping name? Should be documented if
> there is one.
It was nothing more than a bad API d
ratijas added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
> ExpandableListItem.qml:269
> + */
> +property bool isEnabled: true
> +
Why simply Item::enabled wasn't enough? Is there a real use-case that justifies
an extra property with overlapping name? Should be documented if there is one.
REPOSIT
BUILD UNSTABLE
Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kio/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/1360/
Project:
kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
Date of build:
Wed, 02 Feb 2022 18:49:54 +
Build duration:
19 min and counting
JUnit Tests
Name: projectroot Fa
BUILD UNSTABLE
Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kio/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/1359/
Project:
kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
Date of build:
Wed, 02 Feb 2022 09:55:31 +
Build duration:
3 min 41 sec and counting
JUnit Tests
Name: projectr
