KDE CI: Frameworks » kcoreaddons » kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 111 - Still Unstable!

BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kcoreaddons/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/111/ Project: kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 Date of build: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 00:45:23 + Build duration: 26 min and counting JUnit Tests Name: project

KDE CI: Frameworks » kcoreaddons » kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 110 - Unstable!

BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kcoreaddons/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/110/ Project: kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 Date of build: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 22:46:32 + Build duration: 1 hr 58 min and counting JUnit Tests Name: pr

Re: Would distributions have an issue if KF 5.77+ would require Qt >= 5.14 (instead of >= 5.13 as of now)?

On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:30 PM Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > Not from KDE neon of course, we're on 5.15. And not from the KDE snaps build > either. But I suppose there's more than just Linux distros to consider as we > ship apps using KDE frameworks on Flatpak, Android, Windows, even Mac to > p

KDE CI: Frameworks » kcoreaddons » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.14 - Build # 7 - Still Unstable!

BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kcoreaddons/job/kf5-qt5%20SUSEQt5.14/7/ Project: kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.14 Date of build: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 22:55:26 + Build duration: 4 min 7 sec and counting BUILD ARTIFACTS abi-compatib

KDE CI: Frameworks » kcoreaddons » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.14 - Build # 6 - Unstable!

BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kcoreaddons/job/kf5-qt5%20SUSEQt5.14/6/ Project: kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.14 Date of build: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 22:46:32 + Build duration: 8 min 52 sec and counting BUILD ARTIFACTS abi-compati

KDE CI: Frameworks » kio » kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 359 - Still Unstable!

BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kio/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/359/ Project: kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 Date of build: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 21:47:05 + Build duration: 3 min 45 sec and counting JUnit Tests Name: projectro

KDE CI: Frameworks » kio » kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 358 - Still Unstable!

BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kio/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/358/ Project: kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 Date of build: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 21:43:08 + Build duration: 3 min 55 sec and counting JUnit Tests Name: projectro

KDE CI: Frameworks » solid » kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 33 - Fixed!

BUILD SUCCESS Build URL https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/solid/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/33/ Project: kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 Date of build: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 10:32:59 + Build duration: 58 sec and counting JUnit Tests Name: projectroot Fai

KACL from KIO isn't really POSIX-compliant

Hello everyone. I tried compiling kio/src/core/kacl.cpp on FreeBSD, which does support POSIX ACLs, and failed. This is because KACL's code uses non-standard Linux-specific acl_* functions. I tried implementing them using standard ones and it turned out to be impossible, mainly because types like a