KDE CI: Frameworks » solid » kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 32 - Failure!

BUILD FAILURE Build URL https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/solid/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/32/ Project: kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 Date of build: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 06:18:27 + Build duration: 25 sec and counting CONSOLE OUTPUT [...truncated 562

Re: Would distributions have an issue if KF 5.77+ would require Qt >= 5.14 (instead of >= 5.13 as of now)?

On Tuesday, December 01, 2020 13:13 CET, "Friedrich W. H. Kossebau" wrote: > QUESTION: > Would any of the distributions have an issue with requiring Qt 5.14 instead of > Qt 5.13? For OpenMandriva, no problem, we're on 5.15.2 on all branches that will get 5.77. ttyl bero

KDE CI: Frameworks » kio » kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 357 - Still Unstable!

BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kio/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/357/ Project: kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 Date of build: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 20:13:32 + Build duration: 9 min 21 sec and counting JUnit Tests Name: projectro

Re: Would distributions have an issue if KF 5.77+ would require Qt >= 5.14 (instead of >= 5.13 as of now)?

Hi, with my KDE Android hat on this would be fine, we use Qt 5.15. For KDE's own Windows/Mac builds I'd expect it to be similar. What most/all not-traditional-Linux-distro users have in common is that they are not bound to the specific Qt version decided and shipped by a vendor and instead eithe

Re: Would distributions have an issue if KF 5.77+ would require Qt >= 5.14 (instead of >= 5.13 as of now)?

Not from KDE neon of course, we're on 5.15. And not from the KDE snaps build either. But I suppose there's more than just Linux distros to consider as we ship apps using KDE frameworks on Flatpak, Android, Windows, even Mac to ponder too. Jonathan On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 at 12:14, Friedrich W. H. K

Would distributions have an issue if KF 5.77+ would require Qt >= 5.14 (instead of >= 5.13 as of now)?

Hi, last week KDE Frameworks master saw a bump in the required/expected minimal Qt version to Qt 5.13, following rules once agreed and noted here: https://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Policies#Frameworks_Qt_requirements I would like to challenge that former decision though and propose to instead

KDE CI: Frameworks » kio » kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 - Build # 356 - Still Unstable!

BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/job/kio/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/356/ Project: kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15 Date of build: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 09:27:40 + Build duration: 5 min 0 sec and counting JUnit Tests Name: projectroo