Re: Review Request 123514: Make it possible to treat non-sequential QIODevice asynchronously

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123514/ --- (Updated April 30, 2015, 2:08 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and

Re: Review Request 123514: Make it possible to treat non-sequential QIODevice asynchronously

> On April 30, 2015, 1:53 a.m., Mark Gaiser wrote: > > autotests/accessmanagertest.cpp, line 82 > > > > > > The / should be a QDir::separator, no? Nope. Qt decodes the / accordingly. http://doc.qt.io/qt-5.4/qdir.

Re: Review Request 123514: Make it possible to treat non-sequential QIODevice asynchronously

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123514/#review79704 --- autotests/accessmanagertest.cpp (line 79)

Re: Review Request 123491: Add a test that checks the modules we're depending on exist

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123491/ --- (Updated abr. 29, 2015, 11:23 p.m.) Status -- This change has been d

Re: Cannot debug ioslaves

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:33 PM, David Faure wrote: > On Wednesday 29 April 2015 15:21:58 Aleix Pol wrote: >> Hi, >> I was looking into a problem, and ended up in this web page: >> https://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/Debugging/Debugging_IOSlaves >> >> After some greps, I realized most o

Re: Review Request 123556: KPackage::findPackages with a filter callback

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123556/#review79698 --- src/kpackage/packageloader.cpp (line 273)

Re: Versioning of Frameworks

On Wednesday 29 April 2015 15:00:32 Christian Mollekopf wrote: > You don't have to maintain any other combinations that what you already > do. > Just because the cmake versions aren't automatically bumped doesn't mean > you suddenly have to test every conceivable combination of versions. How can t

Re: Versioning of Frameworks

On Wednesday 29 April 2015 11:24:48 Kevin Funk wrote: > Use-case: Potential contributor working on KDevelop: > - Has KF5 installed from distro packages > - KDevelop/KDevPlatform compiled from Git > - There's a bug in ktexteditor (tier 3) > - Likes to checkout just ktexteditor, fix the issue, compil

Re: Cannot debug ioslaves

On Wednesday 29 April 2015 15:21:58 Aleix Pol wrote: > Hi, > I was looking into a problem, and ended up in this web page: > https://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/Debugging/Debugging_IOSlaves > > After some greps, I realized most of it is gone. Anybody knows what's > up with this? And if t

Re: Versioning of Frameworks

Christian, David isn't the only one with these thoughts. I agree with everything he said, and was thinking about the dependency zoo also, but couldn't form the words until I read what he wrote. That's exactly what I was thinking. It would be like the old rpm dependency hell from early linux days a

Re: Versioning of Frameworks

On Tuesday 28 April 2015 12:17:00 Christian Mollekopf wrote: > Our dependency tree is now indeed reduced, but if we want to update a > single library, we are forced to update all libraries, due to the > version-lock caused by periodic bumping of dependencies. You say at the end of the mail that y

Re: Review Request 123514: Make it possible to treat non-sequential QIODevice asynchronously

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123514/ --- (Updated April 29, 2015, 6:28 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and

Re: Review Request 123567: Add an Arch Linux package search provider

> On April 29, 2015, 1:55 p.m., Milian Wolff wrote: > > shouldn't something like this be provided by the distribution? doesn't make > > much sense to have it on non-arch systems, no? > > Anthony Vital wrote: > I don't know but there are search providers for debian and opensuse > already.

Re: Review Request 123567: Add an Arch Linux package search provider

> On avr. 29, 2015, 1:55 après-midi, Milian Wolff wrote: > > shouldn't something like this be provided by the distribution? doesn't make > > much sense to have it on non-arch systems, no? I don't know but there are search providers for debian and opensuse already. - Anthony

Re: Review Request 123567: Add an Arch Linux package search provider

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123567/#review79686 --- shouldn't something like this be provided by the distribution?

Re: Review Request 123525: Remove bookmarks syncing from KFilePlacesModel and use user-places.xbel only.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123525/ --- (Updated April 29, 2015, 1:38 p.m.) Status -- This change has been m

Re: Review Request 123523: KPropertiesDialog::KPropertiesDialog(urls) and KPropertiesDialog::showDialog(urls)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123523/ --- (Updated April 29, 2015, 1:38 p.m.) Status -- This change has been m

Cannot debug ioslaves

Hi, I was looking into a problem, and ended up in this web page: https://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/Debugging/Debugging_IOSlaves After some greps, I realized most of it is gone. Anybody knows what's up with this? And if there's anything we can do to debug an ioslave, anyway? Cheers! A

Review Request 123567: Add an Arch Linux package search provider

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123567/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kio Description ---

Re: Versioning of Frameworks

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015, at 01:29 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Wednesday 29 April 2015 12:19:18 Christian Mollekopf wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015, at 11:03 AM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > > On Wednesday 29 April 2015 09:35:12 Christian Mollekopf wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015, at 12:11 AM, Al

Re: Review Request 123556: KPackage::findPackages with a filter callback

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123556/ --- (Updated April 29, 2015, 12:12 p.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: Review Request 123556: KPackage::findPackages with a filter callback

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123556/#review79667 --- Ship it! Ship It! src/kpackage/packageloader.h (line 59)

Re: Re: Versioning of Frameworks

On Wednesday 29 April 2015 12:19:18 Christian Mollekopf wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015, at 11:03 AM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > On Wednesday 29 April 2015 09:35:12 Christian Mollekopf wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015, at 12:11 AM, Aleix Pol wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Christian

Re: Review Request 123556: KPackage::findPackages with a filter callback

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123556/ --- (Updated April 29, 2015, 10:51 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks an

Review Request 123556: KPackage::findPackages with a filter callback

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123556/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Plasma. Repository: kpackage Desc

Re: Versioning of Frameworks

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015, at 11:03 AM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Wednesday 29 April 2015 09:35:12 Christian Mollekopf wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015, at 12:11 AM, Aleix Pol wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Christian Mollekopf > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Christian, > > > I und

Re: Review Request 123491: Add a test that checks the modules we're depending on exist

> On April 24, 2015, 3:49 p.m., Kevin Funk wrote: > > modules/ECMGeneratePriFile.cmake, line 180 > > > > > > Just tested the patch myself on sonnet. > > > > The test indeed breaks if sonnet is not instal

Re: Versioning of Frameworks

On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 12:17:00 Christian Mollekopf wrote: > Hey, > > For the Kolab Groupware Server we use some KDE libraries on the server. > Servers being what they are, the libraries we require are often not > available by default because the systems are too old, and we end-up > backportin

Re: Re: Versioning of Frameworks

On Wednesday 29 April 2015 09:35:12 Christian Mollekopf wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015, at 12:11 AM, Aleix Pol wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Christian Mollekopf > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Christian, > > I understand your needs, I've seen similar complaints before. > > > > Letting f

Re: Review Request 123532: Add find modules for ModemManager and NetworkManager

> On Dub. 28, 2015, 4:09 odp., Lamarque Souza wrote: > > It worked here, so it's a +1 from me. I just would like the > > extra-cmake-module maintainer to give the final "ship it". > > Jan Grulich wrote: > Hmm, I realized that this would break backward compatibility with > plasma-nm, becaus

Re: Versioning of Frameworks

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015, at 12:11 AM, Aleix Pol wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Christian Mollekopf > wrote: > > Hi Christian, > I understand your needs, I've seen similar complaints before. > > Letting frameworks depend on different versions could make sense, but > I also fear it mig

Re: Review Request 123532: Add find modules for ModemManager and NetworkManager

> On Dub. 28, 2015, 4:09 odp., Lamarque Souza wrote: > > It worked here, so it's a +1 from me. I just would like the > > extra-cmake-module maintainer to give the final "ship it". Hmm, I realized that this would break backward compatibility with plasma-nm, because in plasma-nm we use NETWORKMA

Re: Review Request 123542: [runtime] Move platform specific code into plugins

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123542/ --- (Updated April 29, 2015, 8:23 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and