ki18n_wrap_ui and libraries

Hi all, I just tried to fix i18n for KWin/5 and stumbled over a problem with ui files and libraries. If my understanding is correct one needs to define TRANSLATION_DOMAIN before including KLocalizedString for library code. But the CMake macro ki18n_wrap_ui does not allow to define the TRANSLAT

Re: Android integration in KConfig framework

On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Aleix Pol wrote: > On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 7:27 PM, JAZEIX Johnny wrote: > >> Hi again, >> >> I downloaded cmake 3.0.0-rc4 but when I use cmake with >> set(CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME Android) I've got the output in attachment. >> Where I installed cmake (/usr/local/share

Re: KF5 Maintainers: Please get ready for release

On Monday 28 April 2014 18:13:44 Marco Martin wrote: > On Monday 28 April 2014, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Martin Klapetek did that for all frameworks a while back. All the > > frameworks related products are prefixed with "frameworks-". Looks like > > your modules got moved after that and so are inde

Re: KF5 Maintainers: Please get ready for release

On Monday 28 April 2014 16:32:41 Ivan Čukić wrote: > Hi, > > Should we create a new component in bko, or we can rename the existing one > (kactivities -> frameworks-kactivities)? (I did the former, but wanted to > check) > > The same question for the revboard - should the repository be renamed to

Re: KF5 Maintainers: Please get ready for release

On Monday 28 April 2014, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Martin Klapetek did that for all frameworks a while back. All the > frameworks related products are prefixed with "frameworks-". Looks like > your modules got moved after that and so are indeed missing. You think > right, you need to add them to bugzil

Re: KF5 Maintainers: Please get ready for release

Hello, On Monday 28 April 2014 16:32:41 Ivan Čukić wrote: > Should we create a new component in bko, or we can rename the existing one > (kactivities -> frameworks-kactivities)? (I did the former, but wanted to > check) Whatever works for you. > The same question for the revboard - should the r

Re: Review Request 117805: Introduce kdoctools_install()

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117805/#review56764 --- KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake

Review Request 117842: Add/fix message extraction for repo frameworks/kconfig

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117842/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Aurélien Gâteau. Repository: kconfi

Re: KF5 Maintainers: Please get ready for release

Hi, Should we create a new component in bko, or we can rename the existing one (kactivities -> frameworks-kactivities)? (I did the former, but wanted to check) The same question for the revboard - should the repository be renamed to frameworks-kactivities? The only thing that I'm having issues w

Re: Review Request 117838: Fix KWin decorations look-up

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117838/ --- (Updated April 28, 2014, 1:37 p.m.) Status -- This change has been m

Re: Review Request 117838: Fix KWin decorations look-up

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117838/#review56753 --- This review has been submitted with commit 36e93e9c5a44651302

Re: Review Request 117838: Fix KWin decorations look-up

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117838/#review56752 --- Ship it! partially overlaps with https://git.reviewboard.kde.

Review Request 117838: Fix KWin decorations look-up

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117838/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and kwin. Repository: kwin Descriptio

Re: Major regression in KService?

On Monday 28 April 2014 08:51:02 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > Hi all, > > since updating this morning it looks to me like KService has regressed > really badly. On my setup I see the following problems: > * kcmshell5 is not listing all KCMs it should find > * same for systemsettings > * KWin is unable

Re: KF5 Maintainers: Please get ready for release

Hello, On Monday 28 April 2014 13:32:08 Marco Martin wrote: > On Sunday 27 April 2014, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Marco Martin: > > - kdeclarative > > - plasma-framework > > I think it's pretty fine on my part, i'll take another review on the > metadata files. > one thing I think i need are toplev

Re: KF5 Maintainers: Please get ready for release

On Sunday 27 April 2014, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Marco Martin: > - kdeclarative > - plasma-framework I think it's pretty fine on my part, i'll take another review on the metadata files. one thing I think i need are toplevel bugzilla products for each framework, right? (if so i'll open a sysadmin

Re: KDE Frameworks Release Cycle

On Sunday 27 April 2014, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Of course, going with this type of cycle comes with some price of its own: > * Features in released modules can only be introduced in a very fine > grained way so as to not jeopardize the stability; on one hand I'll probably miss feature branches, on

Re: Fwd: KDE Frameworks Release Cycle

On Sunday, April 27, 2014 15:55:07 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Diumenge, 27 d'abril de 2014, a les 15:15:32, David Faure va escriure: > > FYI. > > Interesting fact here that original the mail was just sent to k-f-d and > k-c-d. > > I am seeing similar patterns in the plasma land, where they wen

Review Request 117823: Add ecm_install_po_files_as_qm() function

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117823/ --- Review request for Build System, Extra Cmake Modules and KDE Frameworks.

Re: Review Request 117805: Introduce kdoctools_install()

> On April 28, 2014, 1:31 a.m., Luigi Toscano wrote: > > I think you can simplify the match condition: manpages docbooks starts with > > "man-" prefix I didn't check on the "man-" prefix because a comment in kdoctools_create_manpage() says 'sometimes we have "man-" prepended'. Is it mandatory

Re: Major regression in KService?

Martin GräßlinOn Monday 28 April 2014 08:51:02 wrote: > Hi all, > > since updating this morning it looks to me like KService has regressed > really badly. On my setup I see the following problems: > * kcmshell5 is not listing all KCMs it should find > * same for systemsettings > * KWin is unable

Re: Major regression in KService?

On Monday 28 April 2014 08:51:02 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > Hi all, > > since updating this morning it looks to me like KService has regressed > really badly. Same; I can't start plasma-shell. Getting things like: plasma_shell(11551)/default KServiceTypeTrader::defaultOffers: KServiceTypeTrader: s