Jenkins build is back to stable : kdelibs4support_master_qt5 #156

See ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : kinit_master_qt5 #66

See ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Build failed in Jenkins: kinit_master_qt5 #65

See Changes: [aleixpol] KF5 libexec files are now located in lib/libexec/kf5 -- [...truncated 12 lines...] == Cleaning Source Tree HEAD is now at 3cf90b5 Add framework information in metainfo.yaml fi

Review Request 117799: Clean up private slots in KCompletion

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117799/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kcompletion Description

Re: Review Request 117688: Do not skip a language if there is no application catalog for it

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117688/#review56655 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Chusslove Illich On April 22, 2014, 3:

Re: Review Request 117795: Adapt to yaml file renaming ($framework.yaml => metainfo.yaml)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117795/#review56646 --- src/depdiagram-prepare

Review Request 117795: Adapt to yaml file renaming ($framework.yaml => metainfo.yaml)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117795/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Alex Merry. Repository: kapidox D

Jenkins build became unstable: kdelibs4support_master_qt5 #152

See ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Jenkins build is still unstable: kwindowsystem_master_qt5 » All,LINBUILDER #53

See ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Re: Review Request 117792: Rename kreadconfig and kwriteconfig for coinstallability

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117792/#review56638 --- This review has been submitted with commit b7887433d5dd44a441

Re: Review Request 117792: Rename kreadconfig and kwriteconfig for coinstallability

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117792/ --- (Updated April 26, 2014, 5:39 p.m.) Status -- This change has been m

Re: Review Request 117792: Rename kreadconfig and kwriteconfig for coinstallability

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117792/#review56637 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Ottens On April 26, 2014, 4:48 p

Re: Review Request 117708: move kioslave docs paths for co-installability

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117708/#review56636 --- This review has been submitted with commit 65833d5f436cad860f

Re: Review Request 117708: move kioslave docs paths for co-installability

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117708/ --- (Updated April 26, 2014, 5:24 p.m.) Status -- This change has been m

Review Request 117792: Rename kreadconfig and kwriteconfig for coinstallability

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117792/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kconfig Description

Re: Review Request 117777: Make the KSelectionProxyModel unit test pass

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/11/#review56631 --- This review has been submitted with commit fd6d554d8af7fe74d6

Re: Review Request 117777: Make the KSelectionProxyModel unit test pass

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/11/#review56632 --- This review has been submitted with commit 7cd8252d2c662c6db4

Re: Review Request 117777: Make the KSelectionProxyModel unit test pass

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/11/ --- (Updated April 26, 2014, 3:40 p.m.) Status -- This change has been m

Re: Review Request 117777: Make the KSelectionProxyModel unit test pass

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/11/#review56633 --- This review has been submitted with commit 2fc7aeab836b0e4036

Re: Review Request 117688: Do not skip a language if there is no application catalog for it

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117688/#review56630 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Ottens On April 22, 2014, 1:39 p

Re: Review Request 117777: Make the KSelectionProxyModel unit test pass

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/11/#review56629 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Ottens On April 25, 2014, 7:18 p

Jenkins build is back to normal : ktexteditor_master_qt5 #372

See ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Jenkins build is still unstable: kwindowsystem_master_qt5 » All,LINBUILDER #52

See ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Jenkins build became unstable: kpty_master_qt5 #30

See ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : kross_master_qt5 #46

See ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : kmediaplayer_master_qt5 #43

See ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : khtml_master_qt5 #77

See ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : kdewebkit_master_qt5 #35

See ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Re: Infopage in frameworkintegration

El Dissabte, 26 d'abril de 2014, a les 13:26:31, Alex Merry va escriure: > FrameworkIntegration installs a bunch of images and css files to > ${DATA_INSTALL_DIR}/kf5/infopage. LXR suggests nothing ever references > an "infopage" directory (either in kf5-qt5 or in qt4-latest), except for > the CMake

Re: Review Request 117781: Install again the content of common/, prepare for other languages too

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117781/#review56620 --- This review has been submitted with commit fd96fa5b175d965bbe

Re: Review Request 117781: Install again the content of common/, prepare for other languages too

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117781/#review56619 --- This review has been submitted with commit 75ba2ae6c1f35056cb

Re: Review Request 117781: Install again the content of common/, prepare for other languages too

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117781/#review56622 --- This review has been submitted with commit 1cd33b3cad5c9a38d3

Re: Review Request 117781: Install again the content of common/, prepare for other languages too

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117781/#review56621 --- This review has been submitted with commit 184882c4c5418a9fc9

Re: Review Request 117781: Install again the content of common/, prepare for other languages too

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117781/ --- (Updated April 26, 2014, 1:29 p.m.) Status -- This change has been m

Re: Review request: kdeebugdialog5 co-installability

On Thursday 24 April 2014 14:49:00 Jonathan Riddell wrote: > Reviewboard does not like this patch and even my usual goto man for git help > agateau can't work out why. So here's a manual review request > > kdelibs4support: > http://starsky.19inch.net/~jr/tmp/DIFF This seems to be about oxygen r

Re: plasma-framework in kdereview

On Saturday, April 26, 2014, David Faure wrote: >> David is acting on the move as I'm typing that email. Stay tuned! :-) > > plasma-framework is now under frameworks/. > > kdesrc-build users, remember to do > rm -rf kdereview/plasma-framework playground/libs/plasma-framework > to avoid hacking in

Re: Why is plasma-framework using /usr/share/kde5?

On Tuesday 22 April 2014 10:40:45 Daniel Vrátil wrote: > On Monday 21 of April 2014 17:32:10 you wrote: > > On Tuesday 15 April 2014 18:14:36 Daniel Vrátil wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm wondering why Plasma Framework installs it's .desktop files to > > > /usr/share/kde5 by default? It causes so

Infopage in frameworkintegration

FrameworkIntegration installs a bunch of images and css files to ${DATA_INSTALL_DIR}/kf5/infopage. LXR suggests nothing ever references an "infopage" directory (either in kf5-qt5 or in qt4-latest), except for the CMakeLists.txt files in frameworkintegration, and the README.md (which suggests the im

Jenkins build is back to normal : frameworkintegration_master_qt5 #65

See ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : plasma-framework_master_qt5 » All,LINBUILDER #309

See ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : kio_master_qt5 #168

See ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Jenkins build is still unstable: kwindowsystem_master_qt5 » All,LINBUILDER #51

See ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Build failed in Jenkins: kmediaplayer_master_qt5 #42

See Changes: [faure] cleanup after non-idempotent script -- Started by remote host 127.0.0.1 with note: Triggered by commit Building remotely on LinuxSlave - 4 (PACKAGER LINBUILDER) in workspace

Build failed in Jenkins: kio_master_qt5 #167

See Changes: [faure] cleanup after non-idempotent script -- Started by remote host 127.0.0.1 with note: Triggered by commit Building remotely on LinuxSlave - 1 (PACKAGER LINBUILDER) in workspace

Build failed in Jenkins: kdewebkit_master_qt5 #34

See Changes: [faure] cleanup after non-idempotent script -- Started by remote host 127.0.0.1 with note: Triggered by commit Building remotely on LinuxSlave - 1 (PACKAGER LINBUILDER) in workspace <

Build failed in Jenkins: khtml_master_qt5 #76

See Changes: [aleixpol] flag.png was renamed to kf5_flag.png [faure] cleanup after non-idempotent script -- Started by remote host 127.0.0.1 with note: Triggered by commit Started by remote host 127.0

Build failed in Jenkins: kdelibs4support_master_qt5 #146

See Changes: [faure] separate framework version from dependencies version, to be able to increase the version in two steps at release time, so CI doesn't break [aleixpol] Add l10n to be installed [aleixpol] Cannot rename 2 thing

Build failed in Jenkins: frameworkintegration_master_qt5 #64

See Changes: [faure] separate framework version from dependencies version, to be able to increase the version in two steps at release time, so CI doesn't break [faure] cleanup after non-idempotent script

Build failed in Jenkins: plasma-framework_master_qt5 » All,LINBUILDER #308

See Changes: [alex.merry] Use KF5_INCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR and KF5_INSTALL_TARGETS_DEFAULT_ARGS -- Started by upstream project "plasma-framework_master_qt5" build

Jenkins build is still unstable: kwindowsystem_master_qt5 » All,LINBUILDER #50

See ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Build failed in Jenkins: kwallet_master_qt5 #95

See Changes: [alex.merry] Use KF5_INCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR and KF5_INSTALL_TARGETS_DEFAULT_ARGS [faure] separate framework version from dependencies version, to be able to increase the version in two steps at release time, so CI doesn't break

Build failed in Jenkins: ktexteditor_master_qt5 #371

See Changes: [alex.merry] Use KF5_INCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR and KF5_INSTALL_TARGETS_DEFAULT_ARGS [faure] separate framework version from dependencies version, to be able to increase the version in two steps at release time, so CI doesn't b

Build failed in Jenkins: kross_master_qt5 #45

See Changes: [alex.merry] Use KF5_INCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR and KF5_INSTALL_TARGETS_DEFAULT_ARGS [faure] separate framework version from dependencies version, to be able to increase the version in two steps at release time, so CI doesn't break [

Re: Review Request 117511: Add class for finding the kde4 config and apps home dirs.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117511/ --- (Updated April 26, 2014, 11:21 a.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: Review Request 117511: Add class for finding the kde4 config and apps home dirs.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117511/#review56610 --- This review has been submitted with commit 669a089e8cbb3c15a0

Jenkins build is still unstable: kwindowsystem_master_qt5 » All,LINBUILDER #49

See ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Re: Review Request 117012: Place KJsEmbed headers directly under ${INCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR}/KJsEmbed instead of under ${INCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR}/KJsEmbed/kjsembed [was: Place KJsEmbed camelcase header under $

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117012/ --- (Updated April 26, 2014, 10:41 a.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: Review Request 117012: Place KJsEmbed headers directly under ${INCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR}/KJsEmbed instead of under ${INCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR}/KJsEmbed/kjsembed [was: Place KJsEmbed camelcase header under $

> On April 23, 2014, 5:09 p.m., David Faure wrote: > > The reason I did it this way was because existing application code uses > > > > #include > > #include > > etc. > > See e.g. > > http://lxr.kde.org/source/kde/kdelibs/kross/kjs/kjsscript.cpp?v=stable-qt4 > > > > So I picked the "namespace

Re: Review Request 117012: Place KJsEmbed headers directly under ${INCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR}/KJsEmbed instead of under ${INCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR}/KJsEmbed/kjsembed [was: Place KJsEmbed camelcase header under $

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117012/#review56605 --- This review has been submitted with commit 856fcbab0765ce21c1

Re: Review Request 117012: Place KJsEmbed headers directly under ${INCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR}/KJsEmbed instead of under ${INCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR}/KJsEmbed/kjsembed [was: Place KJsEmbed camelcase header under $

> On April 23, 2014, 5:09 p.m., David Faure wrote: > > The reason I did it this way was because existing application code uses > > > > #include > > #include > > etc. > > See e.g. > > http://lxr.kde.org/source/kde/kdelibs/kross/kjs/kjsscript.cpp?v=stable-qt4 > > > > So I picked the "namespace

Re: Review Request 117777: Make the KSelectionProxyModel unit test pass

> On April 26, 2014, 8:51 a.m., Stephen Kelly wrote: > > Would it be a good idea to start by reverting > > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116096/ ? > > Alex Merry wrote: > So we have no unit tests? I don't really see how that would help (except > in the strict sense of no unit tests =>

Re: Review Request 117777: Make the KSelectionProxyModel unit test pass

> On April 26, 2014, 8:51 a.m., Stephen Kelly wrote: > > Would it be a good idea to start by reverting > > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116096/ ? > > Alex Merry wrote: > So we have no unit tests? I don't really see how that would help (except > in the strict sense of no unit tests =>

Re: RFC: Do we want the entire commit history to be pushed if code is moved to another repository?

On Saturday 26 April 2014 09:20:08 Frank Reininghaus wrote: > Hi everyone, > > when kdelibs was split into the different frameworks repositories, the > git history was dropped. I think that this was a good idea - splitting > the history properly would have been an extremely complex task, and > eve

Re: plasma-framework in kdereview

On Saturday 26 April 2014 10:56:00 Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello, > > On Saturday 26 April 2014 02:33:07 Kevin Ottens wrote: > > On Saturday 26 April 2014 01:57:09 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > El Divendres, 25 d'abril de 2014, a les 12:34:32, Marco Martin va > > escriure: > > > > since it was don

Re: Review Request 117777: Make the KSelectionProxyModel unit test pass

> On April 26, 2014, 8:51 a.m., Stephen Kelly wrote: > > Would it be a good idea to start by reverting > > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116096/ ? So we have no unit tests? I don't really see how that would help (except in the strict sense of no unit tests => no failing unit tests). - Al

Re: Review Request 117780: Add a FindKF5.cmake module

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117780/#review56596 --- This review has been submitted with commit 12e3e7e2d6685aa29a

Re: Review Request 117780: Add a FindKF5.cmake module

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117780/ --- (Updated April 26, 2014, 9:07 a.m.) Status -- This change has been m

Re: plasma-framework in kdereview

Hello, On Saturday 26 April 2014 02:33:07 Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Saturday 26 April 2014 01:57:09 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Divendres, 25 d'abril de 2014, a les 12:34:32, Marco Martin va escriure: > > > since it was done earlier this week, better announce it formally, so > > > everybody ca

Re: Review Request 117777: Make the KSelectionProxyModel unit test pass

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/11/#review56594 --- Would it be a good idea to start by reverting https://git.rev

Re: Update your copy of extra-cmake-modules

Alex Merry wrote: > On 21/04/14 16:26, šumski wrote: >> On Friday 18 of April 2014 10:37:50 Aurélien Gâteau wrote: >> ... >>> I made it that way intentionally because I consider it bad to have >>> different code generated depending on whether you have the framework is >>> built from a release tarb

Re: Review Request 117781: Install again the content of common/, prepare for other languages too

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117781/#review56593 --- Ship it! Lokks good to me, thanks - Burkhard Lück On April

Re: RFC: Do we want the entire commit history to be pushed if code is moved to another repository?

On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Frank Reininghaus wrote: > Hi everyone, > > when kdelibs was split into the different frameworks repositories, the > git history was dropped. I think that this was a good idea - splitting > the history properly would have been an extremely complex task, and > every

RFC: Do we want the entire commit history to be pushed if code is moved to another repository?

Hi everyone, when kdelibs was split into the different frameworks repositories, the git history was dropped. I think that this was a good idea - splitting the history properly would have been an extremely complex task, and everyone who wants to do source code archaelogy can just look at the kdelib