Re: libmm-qt/libnm-qt as KF5

Hello, On Thursday 03 April 2014 16:47:38 Jan Grulich wrote: > 1) How to name them? Until now we named them ModemManagerQt and > NetworkManagerQt, but if we add KF5 prefix, it would be maybe better to name > it only ModemManager/NetworkManager (with KF5 prefix), but there is a > problem, if you wi

Re: libmm-qt/libnm-qt as KF5

Hello, On Thursday 03 April 2014 20:19:45 Lamarque Souza wrote: > Well, NetworkManagerQt and ModemManagerQt are Qt only libraries since the > beginning. They are not meant to depend on any KDE libraries as I said, so > they are not meant to be merged to KF5. Note this is a blatant logic mistake.

Re: libmm-qt/libnm-qt as KF5

Well, NetworkManagerQt and ModemManagerQt are Qt only libraries since the beginning. They are not meant to depend on any KDE libraries as I said, so they are not meant to be merged to KF5. I looked the branches frameworks and you basically did just that (make them depend on KF5). I think we should

Re: kde4support => kdelibs4support[Was: Re: Releasing Deprecated modules and Tier 4 Definition]

On Wednesday 19 March 2014 10:41:15 Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Hello, > > Hi, > > > On Monday 17 March 2014 22:53:25 Mario Fux KDE ML wrote: > >> Am Montag, 17. März 2014, 18.15:09 schrieb Kevin Ottens: > >> > Porting Aids: > >> > * kde4suppor

libmm-qt/libnm-qt as KF5

Hi, I would like to make libmm-qt and libnm-qt as KDE frameworks, they are based only on Qt, so they could be in Tier 1. I've already started (you can see framework branches) and I would like to ask to a few questions. 1) How to name them? Until now we named them ModemManagerQt and NetworkMana

Re: libmm-qt/libnm-qt as KF5

Hi all, 1) I do not see a real need to rename (again) ModemManagerQt and NetworkManagerQt. They are named that way to indicate they depend only on Qt and not on any library created by KDE, so they are tier1 since the beginning. I am not familiar with KF5's library naming conventions but I would li

Re: libmm-qt/libnm-qt as KF5

On Thursday 03 of April 2014 12:52 Lamarque Souza wrote: > Hi all, > > 1) I do not see a real need to rename (again) ModemManagerQt and > NetworkManagerQt. They are named that way to indicate they depend only on > Qt and not on any library created by KDE, so they are tier1 since the > beginning. I

Re: DrKonqi placement

On 02/04/14 18:07, Kevin Ottens wrote: >> KF5::WindowSystem > > That's only for KStartupInfo right? Pretty sure that doesn't work, either. QX11Info should probably get a startupId() method. That's vaguely on my to-do list somewhere... Alex ___ Kde-f

Re: Review Request 117341: Update documentation templates for the KF5 world

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117341/#review54963 --- This review has been submitted with commit d8927a3f0eb2f7d42a

Re: Review Request 117341: Update documentation templates for the KF5 world

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117341/ --- (Updated April 3, 2014, 9:31 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 117342: Rename the variable which contains the version of XSL stylesheets

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117342/ --- (Updated April 3, 2014, 9:30 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 117342: Rename the variable which contains the version of XSL stylesheets

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117342/#review54962 --- This review has been submitted with commit c7e200ffd50cab838f

Re: DrKonqi placement

On Wednesday, April 02, 2014 07:07:27 PM Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Wednesday 02 April 2014 18:48:24 Aleix Pol wrote: > > - with bugzilla integration (additionally to the previous ones): > > KF5::XmlRpcClient KF5::Wallet KF5::WebKit KF5::ConfigWidgets > > KF5::WidgetsAddons KF5::JobWidgets KF5::Compl

Re: Review Request 117304: Update comment about re-fetching clipboard data.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117304/ --- (Updated April 3, 2014, 12:17 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and

Re: KUnitConversion Review

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 5:15 PM, John Layt wrote: > Hi, > > I've been reviewing KUnitConversion (KUC for short) and doing some small > clean-ups, and I'm slowly coming to the conclusion I'm not a fan of the > api. > However it is used in a few places, so rather than try rewrite the api in > the >

Re: Review Request 117341: Update documentation templates for the KF5 world

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117341/#review54924 --- Ship it! Thanks - Burkhard Lück On April 2, 2014, 10:02 p.

Re: Review Request 117342: Rename the variable which contains the version of XSL stylesheets

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117342/#review54920 --- Ship it! Thanks - Burkhard Lück On April 2, 2014, 11:03 p.

Re: Q: kconfig without kaboutdata behavior

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Alex Merry wrote: > On 03/04/14 09:34, Harald Sitter wrote: >> ahoy, >> >> I just wanted to ask whether it is still mandatory to have a >> KAboutData instance set to have classes such as KConfigShared work in >> a convenient fashion (e.g. KConfigShared::openConfig(

Re: Q: kconfig without kaboutdata behavior

On 03/04/14 09:34, Harald Sitter wrote: > ahoy, > > I just wanted to ask whether it is still mandatory to have a > KAboutData instance set to have classes such as KConfigShared work in > a convenient fashion (e.g. KConfigShared::openConfig() will open the > applications config as long as qapp::app

Q: kconfig without kaboutdata behavior

ahoy, I just wanted to ask whether it is still mandatory to have a KAboutData instance set to have classes such as KConfigShared work in a convenient fashion (e.g. KConfigShared::openConfig() will open the applications config as long as qapp::applicationName is set). In my particular case the pho

Re: kde4support => kdelibs4support[Was: Re: Releasing Deprecated modules and Tier 4 Definition]

Hello, On Thursday 03 April 2014 09:50:24 Jos Poortvliet wrote: > On Wednesday 19 March 2014 10:41:15 Ben Cooksley wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Hi, > > > > > On Monday 17 March 2014 22:53:25 Mario Fux KDE ML wrote: > > >> Am Montag, 17. Mä

Review Request 117353: Add a unit test for changing window title

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117353/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Eike Hein. Repository: kwindowsyste

Jenkins build is back to stable : kwindowsystem_master_qt5 » All,LINBUILDER #40

See ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel