Re: Review Request 115395: Also pass -fno-exceptions when building with clang

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115395/#review48581 --- kde-modules/KDECompilerSettings.cmake

Re: Review Request 115395: Also pass -fno-exceptions when building with clang

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115395/#review48580 --- Don't forget to also remove the comments about # We never

Re: Review Request 115395: Also pass -fno-exceptions when building with clang

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115395/#review48579 --- kde-modules/KDECompilerSettings.cmake

Review Request 115395: Also pass -fno-exceptions when building with clang

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115395/ --- Review request for Build System, Extra Cmake Modules and KDE Frameworks.

Review Request 115394: Split KCompletionBase from kcompletion.h

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115394/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kcompletion Description

Re: Unable to start kcmshell5 * after installing kf5 successfully

On 29/01/14 12:21, Shivam Makkar wrote: > Hello > > I've just build the KF5 using instructions given on > community.kde.org/framework/building > using build-kdesrc script. > the build was successful but I'm unable to run kcmshell5 *. > > when I execut

Re: Review Request 115392: Fix compilation with clang

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115392/ --- (Updated Jan. 29, 2014, 10:55 p.m.) Status -- This change has been m

Re: Review Request 115392: Fix compilation with clang

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115392/#review48575 --- This review has been submitted with commit 9bd234cfb74f18e804

Re: Review Request 115392: Fix compilation with clang

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115392/#review48574 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Christoph Cullmann On Jan. 29, 2014, 1

Review Request 115392: Fix compilation with clang

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115392/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Christoph Cullmann. Repository: kte

Re: kactivities master becomes Qt5/KF5-based

On Wed, January 29, 2014 00:02:09 Ivan Čukić wrote: > > Ping, 4.13 is looming over. If you want to make it so there's no new > > releases of 4.12.x anymore and master is KF5 based, please discuss now. > > > > Personally I'd suggest against it since seems that even if we dicussed for > > that happe

Re: kf5options and qt5options manpages

El Dimecres, 29 de gener de 2014, a les 09:25:47, David Faure va escriure: > On Saturday 25 January 2014 16:36:22 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Dissabte, 25 de gener de 2014, a les 10:20:20, David Faure va escriure: > > > On Tuesday 21 January 2014 18:38:28 Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > > > kdeopti

Unable to start kcmshell5 * after installing kf5 successfully

Hello I've just build the KF5 using instructions given on community.kde.org/framework/building using build-kdesrc script. the build was successful but I'm unable to run kcmshell5 *. when I execute command an empty dialog box appears as attached with mail. and it gives error : "Couldn't start kd

Re: Transitive dependency checks

On 29/01/14 17:29, Michael Palimaka wrote: > Hi, > > In a some (not all) tier 3 frameworks, we check for transitive dependencies: > > #NOTE: here the dependencies of dependencies are displayed as well, this > shouldn't be needed > #after cmake 3.0.0 is released > find_package(...) > > I think th

Transitive dependency checks

Hi, In a some (not all) tier 3 frameworks, we check for transitive dependencies: #NOTE: here the dependencies of dependencies are displayed as well, this shouldn't be needed #after cmake 3.0.0 is released find_package(...) I think this is no longer needed since we ship CMake config files for eac

Re: Review Request 115372: Improve the compiler version checks

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115372/ --- (Updated Jan. 29, 2014, 5:25 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 115372: Improve the compiler version checks

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115372/#review48564 --- This review has been submitted with commit dc3e32e27dcd42f551

Re: Review Request 115372: Improve the compiler version checks

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115372/#review48563 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Alexander Richardson On Jan. 29, 2014,

Review Request 115388: Remove unused dependencies.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115388/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Marco Martin. Repository: kdeclarat

Re: Frameworks sprint in Barcelona

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Àlex Fiestas wrote: > Hi there ! > > It is time we decide when to organize the Frameworks sprint, the main > objective of this sprint is "Making it releseable". > > The Doodle contains only Thursdays from May and April which is the day the > sprint will start (and

Re: Change the ML default reply-to address

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote: > On Wednesday, 2014-01-29, 14:29:42, Mark Gaiser wrote: > >> Yeah, i've had that issue quite a few times. >> Now since i use gmail i either have an easy reply-to-all option or >> (and that's even better) a labs plugin that automatically does >

Frameworks sprint in Barcelona

Hi there ! It is time we decide when to organize the Frameworks sprint, the main objective of this sprint is "Making it releseable". The Doodle contains only Thursdays from May and April which is the day the sprint will start (and end on Sunday) http://doodle.com/n4r7xv3waigbcnv4 Cheers !

Re: Change the ML default reply-to address

On Wednesday, 2014-01-29, 14:29:42, Mark Gaiser wrote: > Yeah, i've had that issue quite a few times. > Now since i use gmail i either have an easy reply-to-all option or > (and that's even better) a labs plugin that automatically does > reply-to-all instead of reply. Which has a different proble

Re: Review Request 115378: Resolve some FIXMEs related to MSVC and Intel

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115378/ --- (Updated Jan. 29, 2014, 4:34 p.m.) Review request for Build System, Extra

Review Request 115387: rename dbus interface file for kinit

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115387/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Stefano Avallone. Repository: kinit

Re: Review Request 115379: Check the C_COMPILER_ID when settings C_FLAGS, not CXX_COMPILER_ID

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115379/ --- (Updated Jan. 29, 2014, 4:31 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 115379: Check the C_COMPILER_ID when settings C_FLAGS, not CXX_COMPILER_ID

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115379/#review48559 --- This review has been submitted with commit eed522877d4b575e2b

Re: Review Request 115378: Resolve some FIXMEs related to MSVC and Intel

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115378/ --- (Updated Jan. 29, 2014, 4:30 p.m.) Review request for Build System, Extra

Re: Review Request 115361: use renamed kmailservice5

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115361/#review48555 --- This review has been submitted with commit 1e91aa164f22b43f40

Re: Review Request 115379: Check the C_COMPILER_ID when settings C_FLAGS, not CXX_COMPILER_ID

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115379/#review48557 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Christophe Giboudeaux On Jan. 29, 2014

Re: Review Request 115381: rename dbus interface file for kmediaplayer

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115381/ --- (Updated Jan. 29, 2014, 4 p.m.) Status -- This change has been marke

Re: Review Request 115359: rename dbus interface files and .desktop files in kio

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115359/#review48551 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Aleix Pol Gonzalez On Jan. 29, 2014, 1

Re: Review Request 115381: rename dbus interface file for kmediaplayer

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115381/#review48556 --- This review has been submitted with commit f4fe77bd9830c80081

Re: Review Request 115359: rename dbus interface files and .desktop files in kio

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115359/#review48554 --- - Jonathan Riddell On Jan. 29, 2014, 3:57 p.m., Jonathan Rid

Re: Review Request 115359: rename dbus interface files and .desktop files in kio

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115359/ --- (Updated Jan. 29, 2014, 3:57 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 115361: use renamed kmailservice5

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115361/ --- (Updated Jan. 29, 2014, 3:58 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 115382: Remove unused dependencies

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115382/#review48552 --- This review has been submitted with commit 603638aa9524660672

Re: Review Request 115382: Remove unused dependencies

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115382/ --- (Updated Jan. 29, 2014, 3:53 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 115382: Remove unused dependencies

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115382/#review48548 --- Ship it! Cool :) - Aleix Pol Gonzalez On Jan. 29, 2014, 3:

Re: Review Request 115378: Resolve some FIXMEs related to MSVC and Intel

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115378/#review48547 --- Looks good, but I can't test it right now. kde-modules/KDEC

Review Request 115382: Remove unused dependencies

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115382/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and David Faure. Repository: kcrash D

Re: Review Request 115376: KDE_SOURCE_FILES_ENABLE_EXCEPTIONS: Handle case where COMPILE_FLAGS is not set

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115376/#review48543 --- This review has been submitted with commit cf6070c980f7b9465c

Re: Review Request 115381: rename dbus interface file for kmediaplayer

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115381/#review48545 --- Ship it! I'm not even aware that anyone actually uses this in

Re: Review Request 115376: KDE_SOURCE_FILES_ENABLE_EXCEPTIONS: Handle case where COMPILE_FLAGS is not set

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115376/ --- (Updated Jan. 29, 2014, 3:15 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 115376: KDE_SOURCE_FILES_ENABLE_EXCEPTIONS: Handle case where COMPILE_FLAGS is not set

> On Jan. 29, 2014, 2:29 p.m., Alex Merry wrote: > > kde-modules/KDECompilerSettings.cmake, lines 204-206 > > > > > > I would have gone for > > if (NOT flags) > > # CMake can give NOTFOUND as a result

Re: Review Request 115380: Find QtGui when being consumed

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115380/#review48540 --- This review has been submitted with commit 3e73a48f101a8521e2

Re: Review Request 115380: Find QtGui when being consumed

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115380/ --- (Updated Jan. 29, 2014, 3:08 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 115380: Find QtGui when being consumed

> On Jan. 29, 2014, 2:59 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > > Then Qt5Core should go, it's a dependency of Qt5Gui and it will be searched > > for already. Sure thing, I'll do that at the same time. - Michael --- This is an automatically

Re: Review Request 115380: Find QtGui when being consumed

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115380/#review48538 --- Then Qt5Core should go, it's a dependency of Qt5Gui and it wil

Re: Review Request 115380: Find QtGui when being consumed

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115380/#review48537 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Martin Gräßlin On Jan. 29, 2014, 3:53

Review Request 115381: rename dbus interface file for kmediaplayer

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115381/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Alex Merry. Repository: kmediaplaye

Review Request 115380: Find QtGui when being consumed

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115380/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Martin Gräßlin. Repository: kwindow

Review Request 115379: Check the C_COMPILER_ID when settings C_FLAGS, not CXX_COMPILER_ID

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115379/ --- Review request for Build System, Extra Cmake Modules and KDE Frameworks.

Review Request 115378: Resolve some FIXMEs related to MSVC and Intel

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115378/ --- Review request for Build System, Extra Cmake Modules, KDE Frameworks, and

Re: Change the ML default reply-to address

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Martin Klapetek wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Nicolás Alvarez > wrote: >> >> 2014-01-28 Martin Klapetek : >> > Hey, >> > >> > would it be possible to change the default reply-to address for this >> > list? >> > It's quite annoying in less-advanced-than

Re: Review Request 115376: KDE_SOURCE_FILES_ENABLE_EXCEPTIONS: Handle case where COMPILE_FLAGS is not set

> On Jan. 29, 2014, 12:59 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > > Why would it be NOTFOUND? Because CMake has a tendency to use NOTFOUND as an explicit "it wasn't just empty, it actually couldn't be found" value. It evaluates that value as FALSE, incidentally. - Alex --

Re: Review Request 115376: KDE_SOURCE_FILES_ENABLE_EXCEPTIONS: Handle case where COMPILE_FLAGS is not set

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115376/#review48533 --- Ship it! kde-modules/KDECompilerSettings.cmake

Re: Review Request 115359: rename dbus interface files and .desktop files in kio

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115359/ --- (Updated Jan. 29, 2014, 1:24 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and

Re: Review Request 115372: Improve the compiler version checks

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115372/ --- (Updated Jan. 29, 2014, 1:20 p.m.) Review request for Build System, Extra

Re: Review Request 115363: Move and comment -fno-common setting

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115363/ --- (Updated Jan. 29, 2014, 1:18 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 115363: Move and comment -fno-common setting

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115363/#review48532 --- This review has been submitted with commit 455483e482f9bcc861

Re: Review Request 115360: Remove the allocator and visibility check

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115360/ --- (Updated Jan. 29, 2014, 1:18 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 115360: Remove the allocator and visibility check

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115360/#review48531 --- This review has been submitted with commit 4e867a836bafd113c6

Re: Review Request 115372: Improve the compiler version checks

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115372/ --- (Updated Jan. 29, 2014, 1:13 p.m.) Review request for Build System, Extra

Re: Review Request 115376: KDE_SOURCE_FILES_ENABLE_EXCEPTIONS: Handle case where COMPILE_FLAGS is not set

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115376/#review48528 --- Why would it be NOTFOUND? - Aleix Pol Gonzalez On Jan. 29,

Re: Change the ML default reply-to address

On Wednesday, 2014-01-29, 12:30:55, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Wednesday 29 January 2014 11:23:31 Kevin Krammer wrote: > > I am subscribed to more than two dozend KDE mailinglist (and numerous > > others). I post to some of the regularily while some others only > > sporadically. "New mail to list"

Re: Where to put QML Bindings for KDE frameworks?

On Wednesday, 2014-01-29, 12:22:39, David Edmundson wrote: > I don't generally think it makes sense to merge these with the > widgets. If you want to build the widgets you wouldn't want the QML > imports, if you want the QML imports you don't want to build the > widgets. If you meant QtQuick, I a

Re: Re: Change the ML default reply-to address

On Wednesday 29 January 2014 11:23:31 Kevin Krammer wrote: > On Wednesday, 2014-01-29, 09:01:00, Martin Klapetek wrote: > > Let's be pragmatic, how many times it happened to you that you actually > > responded to the author alone while you actually intended to respond to > > the > > list? > > How

Re: Where to put QML Bindings for KDE frameworks?

So I think there is some agreement that where we have a relevant 1-1 match we put it with the framework. i.e KIO. knotifications(?), kunitconversion, kconfig, kbookmarks, solid... That still leaves a few items where we need imports which don't have a match: - Helper actions for QML - like qtext

Re: Change the ML default reply-to address

On Wednesday, 2014-01-29, 11:43:37, Martin Klapetek wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Kevin Krammer wrote: > > I am subscribed to more than two dozend KDE mailinglist (and numerous > > others). > > I post to some of the regularily while some others only sporadically. > > "New mail to lis

Re: Change the ML default reply-to address

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014, at 9:30, Martin Klapetek wrote: Hey, would it be possible to change the default reply-to address for this list? It's quite annoying in less-advanced-than-kmail clients always pressing "Reply" and getting only the sender instead of the whole list. There's a switch for that i

Re: Change the ML default reply-to address

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Kevin Krammer wrote: > On Wednesday, 2014-01-29, 09:01:00, Martin Klapetek wrote: > > > Let's be pragmatic, how many times it happened to you that you actually > > responded to the author alone while you actually intended to respond to > the > > list? > > How wou

Re: Change the ML default reply-to address

On Wednesday, 2014-01-29, 09:01:00, Martin Klapetek wrote: > Let's be pragmatic, how many times it happened to you that you actually > responded to the author alone while you actually intended to respond to the > list? How would that happen? Replying to the list always replies to the list. > It'

Review Request 115376: KDE_SOURCE_FILES_ENABLE_EXCEPTIONS: Handle case where COMPILE_FLAGS is not set

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115376/ --- Review request for Build System, Extra Cmake Modules, KDE Frameworks, and A

Re: Where to put QML Bindings for KDE frameworks?

On Wednesday 29 January 2014 09:20:09 Martin Klapetek wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > I don't think we'll get a one size fit all type of solution, that will > > heavily > > depend on the nature of the framework. For instance something like KConfig > > should proba

Re: Review Request 115364: Update tier number

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115364/#review48518 --- This review has been submitted with commit d0faca866bb645b4a4

Re: Review Request 115364: Update tier number

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115364/ --- (Updated Jan. 29, 2014, 9:45 a.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Change the ML default reply-to address

Hi, > > Let's be pragmatic, how many times it happened to you that you actually responded to the author alone while you actually intended to respond to the list? It's just super annoying if you're communicating with lists like plasma-devel which has reply-to-list and dozen more KDE MLs which also

Re: kf5options and qt5options manpages

On Saturday 25 January 2014 16:36:22 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dissabte, 25 de gener de 2014, a les 10:20:20, David Faure va escriure: > > On Tuesday 21 January 2014 18:38:28 Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > > kdeoptions and qtoptions manpages listed the common options to > > > applications > > > us

Re: Where to put QML Bindings for KDE frameworks?

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > I don't think we'll get a one size fit all type of solution, that will > heavily > depend on the nature of the framework. For instance something like KConfig > should probably provide it's own imports, it is in the natural order of > things

Re: Review Request 115363: Move and comment -fno-common setting

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115363/#review48515 --- Ship it! Ship It! - David Faure On Jan. 28, 2014, 8:15 p.m

Re: Review Request 115360: Remove the allocator and visibility check

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115360/#review48514 --- Ship it! Ship It! - David Faure On Jan. 28, 2014, 10:43 p.

Re: Change the ML default reply-to address

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: > 2014-01-28 Martin Klapetek : > > Hey, > > > > would it be possible to change the default reply-to address for this > list? > > It's quite annoying in less-advanced-than-kmail clients always pressing > > "Reply" and getting only the sender i