Re: What to do with kjs & qkjs ?

2012-12-15 Thread Treeve Jelbert
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 15:46:52 +0100, Alexander Neundorf wrote: Hi, for kjs there is also a QT_ONLY option. In this case the library is named qkjs instead of kjs. there is a typo in the cmake file for kjs, it install incorrectly named libraries. $ grep SOV /var/log/sorcery/install/kf5libs-git

Re: What to do with kjs & qkjs ?

2012-12-15 Thread Fredrik Höglund
On Saturday 15 December 2012, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > Hi, > > for kjs there is also a QT_ONLY option. > In this case the library is named qkjs instead of kjs. kjs doesn't actually link to or use Qt, so it probably doesn't make sense to have this option. The only thing it does is change the na

What to do with kjs & qkjs ?

2012-12-15 Thread Alexander Neundorf
Hi, for kjs there is also a QT_ONLY option. In this case the library is named qkjs instead of kjs. I've got multiple questions: do we want to continue to support QT_ONLY also with KDE frameworks ? If so, and when building in QT_ONLY mode, should the installed package still be called kjs, or qk