Re: Current Problem KDEPIM [was Re: Errarous Release 4.5.5 today]

2011-01-15 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Donnerstag, 13. Januar 2011, 10:08:47 schrieb Juergen Sauer: > Am Mittwoch, 12. Januar 2011 schrieb Tom Albers: > > - Original Message - > > > > > But where is the current Version of kdepin in the 4.5.x series ? > > > IMHO are those marked as "stable" > > > > Again, kdepim was *not

Measuring memory consumption

2011-08-07 Thread Sven Burmeister
Hey! Back in 2005 there was an article (http://blogs.kde.org/node/1445) about memory measurement which basically stated that you cannot trust whatever ps aux or KDE's system monitor tells you. The latter displays that information anyway. Ok, so if you as a user now claim that app x uses a huge

Re: Measuring memory consumption

2011-08-07 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Sonntag, 7. August 2011, 15:35:36 schrieb Thiago Macieira: > I was improving my own script a few nights ago. Testing on the same > application as you tested: My findings with your script: sudo perl rssanalyse.pl 10771 Total mapped memory: 745888 kB of which swapped out: 0 kB of which

Re: Measuring memory consumption

2011-08-07 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Sonntag, 7. August 2011, 16:21:45 schrieb Marko Käning: > On Aug 7, 2011, at 3:59 PM, Sven Burmeister wrote: > > This happens when I open a folder with ~14000 emails in kmail2 and does > > not decrease after closing kmail2. > > Hmm, does that mean that kmail2 is actually n

Re: Measuring memory consumption

2011-08-07 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Sonntag, 7. August 2011, 16:56:51 schrieb Marko Käning: > Where can one get the script rssanalyse.pl ? I think the mailinglist did not let his email through because of the attachment. Since Thiago posted it to mailinglist I hope it's ok if I forward it to you. Sven >> Visit http://mail.kde.

Re: Measuring memory consumption

2011-08-07 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Sonntag, 7. August 2011, 12:06:05 schrieb Michael Pyne: > On Sunday, August 07, 2011 15:06:57 Sven Burmeister wrote: > > Back in 2005 there was an article (http://blogs.kde.org/node/1445) about > > memory measurement which basically stated that you cannot trust whatever >

Re: why are bugs ignored over months?

2011-09-21 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Mittwoch, 21. September 2011, 20:17:57 schrieb Brad Hards: > I see lots of comments, so many people care. However there are a lot of > negative comments, so working on such a bug is pretty disheartening for a > developer. That's true! True as well is that most often the rate of negative comment

Re: why are bugs ignored over months?

2011-09-21 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Mittwoch, 21. September 2011, 15:39:57 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo: > On Wednesday, September 21, 2011 15:12:27 Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 21.09.2011 15:08, schrieb Lydia Pintscher: > > > The bug is fixed. As Aaron said this thread will end here. > > > > thank you for https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.

Re: goodbye

2011-09-22 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Donnerstag, 22. September 2011, 10:01:47 schrieb Lydia Pintscher: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 19:11, John Tapsell wrote: > > Reindl, > > > > Sorry to see you go. I don't know why Aseigo is being childish - I > > think this is all just taking its toll on him. This is one of the > > advantages

Re: invest money in free software?

2011-09-22 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Donnerstag, 22. September 2011, 10:46:10 schrieb John Tapsell: > On 22 September 2011 10:04, Robert Klotzner wrote: > > As I am thinking about creating a platform for exactly this purpose, you > > made me curious. Could you point me to the thread where this was > > discussed or maybe some could

Re: Allow users to donate money towards bugs

2011-09-25 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Donnerstag, 22. September 2011, 22:13:12 schrieb Cornelius Schumacher: > On Thursday 22 September 2011 10:29:16 John Tapsell wrote: > > I think it would really help with bug reports if we let people > > > > donate money towards getting bugs fixed. If there are lots of users > > annoyed by a

Re: invest money in free software?

2011-09-29 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Donnerstag, 22. September 2011, 17:33:59 schrieb Sam S.: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 4:13 PM, David Narvaez > > wrote: > > Hi, just wanted to add this link with an interesting (and valid?) point > > of view > > > > http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/how-bug-bounties-are-rat-farming-09201 > > 1 >

Re: Allow users to donate money towards bugs

2011-09-29 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Sonntag, 25. September 2011, 10:56:21 schrieb Lydia Pintscher: > I'd like to recommend watching Stormy Peter's excellent talk titled > "Would you do it again for free". It has some very enlightening points > about this topic. To quote from her blog: http://stormyscorner.com/2008/11/does-money-

Re: Bug triage process needs help

2011-09-30 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Donnerstag, 29. September 2011, 13:25:49 schrieb Sebastian Kügler: > > It's frustrating for users submitting bug reports when an easily > > reproducible bug sits in the queue, without even a comment, for six > > > months. For the record, I'm referring to this bug report here: > This posting of

Re: Bug triage process needs help

2011-09-30 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Freitag, 30. September 2011, 17:12:01 schrieb Martin Gräßlin: > The bugtracker in it's current state does not help to increase the quality > of the software. In fact the quality decreases as the developers have to > spend time on managing garbage. Yes what we get is garbage. Most of the > report

Re: Bug triage process needs help

2011-10-01 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Samstag, 1. Oktober 2011, 07:54:48 schrieb Martin Gräßlin: > For the bugtracker I think there is a simple solution. > If a user has 4.x.y and there is a released 4.x.z with z>y don't accept the > bug report but give the user the information where to request the newer > version. This would mean

Re: Bug triage process needs help

2011-10-01 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Freitag, 30. September 2011, 16:22:28 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo: > c) spend less time blaming each other and more time working on solutions. > this thread is the kind of thing that personally drives me nuts as i see a > lot of "you're doing this wrong" being aimed at people who are doing lots > of

Re: Bug triage process needs help

2011-10-01 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Samstag, 1. Oktober 2011, 09:33:58 schrieb Martin Gräßlin: > Downstreams do not backport fixes. We see that quite clearly. There is no > need to assume that this would change. They also don't know what bugs > exists and what has to be backported. For really critical fixes I do inform > the distr

Re: Bug triage process needs help

2011-10-01 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Samstag, 1. Oktober 2011, 12:34:56 schrieb Martin Gräßlin: > There is ZERO communication with downstream about bugs. We do (at least for > KWin) get no feedback at all about important bugs for the distro and we > give no feedback to the distros. I hardly see distro people in the > bugreports and

Re: Bug triage process needs help

2011-10-05 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Dienstag, 4. Oktober 2011, 16:25:50 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo: > On Saturday, October 1, 2011 09:24:25 Sven Burmeister wrote: > > thread and true for devs and users likewise. The dangerous thing about > > it is that users' and devs' frustration amplify each other. > &g

Re: Bug triage process needs help

2011-10-05 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Mittwoch, 5. Oktober 2011, 11:35:41 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo: > On Tuesday, October 4, 2011 21:46:53 Sven Burmeister wrote: > > Since we have to start somewhere, as a plasma dev, how do you feel about > > prioritising regressions as soon as they are reported and fixing them > &

Re: Call for testing: kio-mtp

2012-09-17 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Montag, 17. September 2012, 17:31:11 schrieb Philipp Schmidt: > When tackling the next big thing, a rewrite of the Amarok MTP Collection I > will keep that in mind though. This would be very welcome! At least for my Galaxy Nexus it does not work with amarok 2.6 to transfer files because for ev

Re: [Nepomuk] Nepomuk - Moving away from Strigi

2012-10-08 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Montag, 8. Oktober 2012, 20:12:07 schrieb Vishesh Handa: > That is the current scenario. All indexing plugin (including ffmpeg) are > optional during compile time. So if you cannot have ffmpeg installed when compiling nepomuk-core you have to re-compile it in order to use the ffmpeg plug-in? I

Re: [Nepomuk] Nepomuk - Moving away from Strigi

2012-10-08 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Montag, 8. Oktober 2012, 20:28:14 schrieb Vishesh Handa: > yes. That is the current scenario. I'm not sure how the packagers handle > this. It would be better if the user would just need to install the plug-in and not a re-compiled nepomuk-core, i.e. make e.g. ffmpeg just a dependency of the

Re: [Nepomuk] Nepomuk - Moving away from Strigi

2012-10-08 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Montag, 8. Oktober 2012, 16:52:48 schrieb Kevin Kofler: > For us in Fedora, this would be not just nice, but REQUIRED. We cannot ship > anything depending on FFmpeg in Fedora. So it's either shipping the > offending indexers in RPM Fusion in a separate package (which will > obviously NOT be inst

Re: [Nepomuk] Nepomuk - Moving away from Strigi

2012-10-08 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Montag, 8. Oktober 2012, 19:44:24 schrieb Martin Sandsmark: > On Monday 8. October 2012 16.52.48 Kevin Kofler wrote: > > For us in Fedora, this would be not just nice, but REQUIRED. We cannot > > ship > > anything depending on FFmpeg in Fedora. > > Why not? Don't you ship the Linux kernel (whic

Re: [Nepomuk] Nepomuk - Moving away from Strigi

2012-10-08 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2012, 01:05:43 schrieb Vishesh Handa: > > a) if this ffmpeg / avlib kindergarten junk does not short term stop, > > using a plugin system in this context will be inevitable; also because > > those idiots apparently still ship incompatible libs with the very same > > path nam

Re: Nepomuk - Moving away from Strigi

2012-10-08 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2012, 01:31:37 schrieb Vishesh Handa: > You would only need to compile the plugin and install it. That's great! So if you keep the plug-ins in a separate tarball then nepomuk-core distros should be able to ship everything but the plug-ins they do not want to. Of course i

Re: [Nepomuk] Nepomuk - Moving away from Strigi

2012-10-08 Thread Sven Burmeister
Am Montag, 8. Oktober 2012, 22:15:03 schrieb Martin Sandsmark: > On Monday 8. October 2012 21.08.02 Sven Burmeister wrote: > > Please do not make this a thread about things lawyers have to decide. Fact > > is that openSUSE and Fedora do not not ship this kind of software because &