Unified internal communications channel

2023-12-07 Thread Nate Graham
Hello everyone, There have been a couple instances of drama this week caused by decisions being made without some of the relevant stakeholders knowing about them. In all cases, the decisions were announced, but either not announced in the places where all the stakeholders saw it, or not all s

Re: Unified internal communications channel

2023-12-07 Thread Carl Schwan
On Thursday, December 7, 2023 4:15:36?PM CET Nate Graham wrote: > Hello everyone, > > There have been a couple instances of drama this week caused by > decisions being made without some of the relevant stakeholders knowing > about them. In all cases, the decisions were announced, but either not >

Re: Unified internal communications channel

2023-12-07 Thread Joshua Goins
Hey Nate, thanks for formalizing this discussion 🙂 Maybe you should give some examples of "internal communication" topics here too, because it might not be clear to everyone. I'm also curious about the implications of mirroring such topics to discuss.kde.org and other "user support" type of pla

Re: Unified internal communications channel

2023-12-07 Thread Joshua Goins
Hi Carl, > Adding a new channel that is either a mailing list, rss feed or a forum > category won't help and will probably only makes it worse. It's also very > difficult to defines that is an important internal news for the whole > community is as it will be different for every subproject in KDE.

Re: Unified internal communications channel

2023-12-07 Thread slbtty
Why not push this more radically by shutting down mailing lists? This story keeps repeating itself. * Long time project primarily used mailing list in the past -> New people come, but they bring a new communication channel -> Split, the community have to choose one -> Choose the new communication

Re: Unified internal communications channel

2023-12-07 Thread Volker Krause
On Donnerstag, 7. Dezember 2023 18:04:24 CET Carl Schwan wrote: > On Thursday, December 7, 2023 4:15:36?PM CET Nate Graham wrote: > > What I'm proposing is some kind of place that *only* has internal > > announcements and is very log signal-to-noise such that we can > > fearlessly recommend that *e

Re: KParts and the Qt5->Qt6 transition

2023-12-07 Thread Carl Schwan
On Wednesday, December 6, 2023 9:51:20?PM CET Nicolas Fella wrote: > Hi, Hi, > the transition of many apps to Qt6 provides some challenges for apps > producing and consuming KParts. > > KParts are implemented as Qt plugins and as such are specific to the Qt > version they are built against. In o