I don't think that wishlist items should be treated in the same way as actual
bugs. Even if the original reporter is no longer interested in a wishlist
report or is no longer contactable, the feature asked for may still be valid.
For KAlarm at least, please exclude wishlist reports from gardenin
Wishlist items are already excluded for all projects.
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023, 7:39 pm David Jarvie, wrote:
> I don't think that wishlist items should be treated in the same way as
> actual bugs. Even if the original reporter is no longer interested in a
> wishlist report or is no longer contactable
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 9:04 AM wrote:
> I'm waiting for an answer, mr. sysadmin. If you accuse me of bad conduct,
> account for it and explain your accusations.
>
> --
> I'm using Tutanota - the end-to-end encrypted email service
>
>
>
> 17 янв. 2023 г., 20:06 От be...@tuta.io:
>
> What backend
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 4:05 AM Justin wrote:
> The gardening team aims to find out if the bug reports are still
> relevant by involving the users who reported them in determining if they
> are still valid.
FWIW that probably doesn't work nearly as well as one would hope when
the user is a develo
I'll have a look when I'm back at my PC and see if I can exclude bugs
reported by you.
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023, 8:57 pm Harald Sitter, wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 4:05 AM Justin wrote:
> > The gardening team aims to find out if the bug reports are still
> > relevant by involving the users who
Actually, what if we just ignore reports that come from a *@kde.org email
address?
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 at 9:42 pm, Justin Zobel wrote:
> I'll have a look when I'm back at my PC and see if I can exclude bugs
> reported by you.
>
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2023, 8:57 pm Harald Sitter, wrote:
>
>> On Thu, J
We can do that but not all developers use a KDE email address.
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023, 9:15 pm AnnoyingRains, wrote:
> Actually, what if we just ignore reports that come from a *@kde.org email
> address?
>
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 at 9:42 pm, Justin Zobel
> wrote:
>
>> I'll have a look when I'm back
Hi,
Am 19.01.23 um 04:04 schrieb Justin:
Hi Nicolas,
This has been discussed with Nate Graham directly who has approved
this cleanup of Bugzilla including the messaging behind it.
KDE consists of more than Nate tough. We discuss and "review" things in
the open.
I am happy to discuss any co
In the regard then it falls to developers with the understanding of the
codebase to triage these.
However it's clear due to the age of these bugs that most developers don't
have time or aren't prioritising these reports.
This is why I've volunteered time to try get engagement happening with
commu
Involvement not evolvement.
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023, 10:06 pm Justin Zobel, wrote:
> In the regard then it falls to developers with the understanding of the
> codebase to triage these.
>
> However it's clear due to the age of these bugs that most developers don't
> have time or aren't prioritising t
Am 18.01.23 um 23:58 schrieb Nicolas Fella:
Hi,
the master branch of frameworks repositories now required Qt6 to build.
Maintenance of KF5 continues in the "kf5" branch.
Those using kdesrc-build make sure your kdesrc-builrc contains
"branch-group kf5-qt5", then it will switch to the correct bra
Hello folks,
I did approve this initiative and I do think there's value to it, but of
course we can definitely have this discussion in the open and tweak its
parameters, or end it if we think it's destroying more value than it's
creating.
I totally agree with Nicolas that in an ideal world,
On 1/19/23 02:35, Nicolas Fella wrote:> Properly cleaning up old
bugreports is important. However, it requires
some level of care and expertise to judge whether a bugreport is still
useful. Judging by the volume of bugreports that is pinged with the same
copy&paste message this care is not appli
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 19. Jänner 2023, 12:26:08 CET schrieb Nicolas Fella:
> Am 19.01.23 um 04:04 schrieb Justin:
> > The gardening team aims to find out if the bug reports are still
> > relevant by involving the users who reported them in determining if
> > they are still valid. This increases commu
We are pleased to announce that CMake 3.25.2 is now available for download.
Please use the latest release from our download page:
https://cmake.org/download/
Thanks for your support!
Changes made since CMake 3.25.1:
15 matches
Mail list logo