On Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2019 07:02:03 CET Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 5:12 PM Michael Pyne wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 03:15:58PM -0700, Nate Graham wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:12:55 -0700 Eike Hein wrote
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 2/27/19 4:38 AM, N
Is there a way to somehow configure the build process? Their automatic
dependency pulling is getting an outdated version of Melt, and it breaks
the build for us in Kdenlive...
Le ven. 22 mars 2019 à 07:43, Tomaz Canabrava a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 9:27 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> >
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 2:31 PM alcinos wrote:
>
> Is there a way to somehow configure the build process? Their automatic
> dependency pulling is getting an outdated version of Melt, and it breaks the
> build for us in Kdenlive...
Yes, you can define a yaml file for it in the root dir, like kri
Le ven. 22 mars 2019 à 14:40, Tomaz Canabrava a écrit :
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 2:31 PM alcinos
> wrote:
> >
> > Is there a way to somehow configure the build process? Their automatic
> dependency pulling is getting an outdated version of Melt, and it breaks
> the build for us in Kdenlive...
>
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 2:45 PM alcinos wrote:
>
>
>
> Le ven. 22 mars 2019 à 14:40, Tomaz Canabrava a écrit :
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 2:31 PM alcinos wrote:
>> >
>> > Is there a way to somehow configure the build process? Their automatic
>> > dependency pulling is getting an outdated ver
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 12:42 AM Milian Wolff wrote:
>
> On Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2019 07:02:03 CET Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 5:12 PM Michael Pyne wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 03:15:58PM -0700, Nate Graham wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:12:55 -0700 Eik
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:47 PM Nate Graham wrote:
>
> One thing I'd really like to not lose is the review status feature
> (approved/changes requested/etc). I've head that this is EE only. Is there
> any word on getting that added to our package?
We'll look into discussing this with them.
>
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 9:26 PM Ben Cooksley wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Over the past few weeks we've had a discussion on whether we'd like to
> migrate from Phabricator to Gitlab, for handling both our code reviews
> as well as internal tasks (user facing bug reports are explicitly out
> of context a
