On Thursday 14 April 2011 4:34:08 pm Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 14.04.11 16:00:11, Ian Wadham wrote:
> > Now kdesrc-build-1.13 reports the first failure on strigi. After that,
> > no major modules will build build. Re strigi, I get the messages:
>
> Looks like either someone broke the strigi re
On 14.04.11 21:59:24, Ian Wadham wrote:
> On Thursday 14 April 2011 4:34:08 pm Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 14.04.11 16:00:11, Ian Wadham wrote:
> > > Now kdesrc-build-1.13 reports the first failure on strigi. After that,
> > > no major modules will build build. Re strigi, I get the messages:
>
Ian Wadham writes:
> The git-clone.log seems to be OK. It is getting strigi from
> git://anongit.kde.org/strigi. Attached is a copy of the cmake
> error log file, but I do not understand any of the error messages
> and have no idea what to do next. Any ideas?
[snip]
> # kdesrc-build running:
There doesn't seem to be a kdesupport package in git or svn for use with KDE
4.6, equivalent to the svn tag kdesupport-for-4.5 for KDE 4.5. Are there plans
to create this?
--
David Jarvie.
KDE developer.
KAlarm author -- http://www.astrojar.org.uk/kalarm
signature.asc
Description: This is a d
On Thursday 14 April 2011 08:34:08 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 14.04.11 16:00:11, Ian Wadham wrote:
> > Now kdesrc-build-1.13 reports the first failure on strigi. After that,
>
> > no major modules will build build. Re strigi, I get the messages:
> Looks like either someone broke the strigi repo
On Thursday 14 April 2011 11:53:17 pm Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> Can you try cloning again (either via kdesrc-build or by just cloning a
> submodule like libstreams like I mentioned in the previous paragraph)?
>
Thanks very much for all the information and advice, Raphael. I am busy
today (Fr
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 23:13:29 David Jarvie wrote:
> There doesn't seem to be a kdesupport package in git or svn for use with KDE
> 4.6, equivalent to the svn tag kdesupport-for-4.5 for KDE 4.5. Are there
> plans to create this?
Last I heard was an explicit no, mostly because many (though no