---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114632/
---
(Updated Jan. 16, 2014, 1:02 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been di
> On Dec. 26, 2013, 1:57 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
> > Hm, you broke the comment :)
>
> Luis Silva wrote:
> What do you mean? It all works fine here.
>
> Christoph Feck wrote:
> Yes, because the compiler does not read comments.
>
> Thomas Lübking wrote:
> Aside this, the approach
> On Dec. 26, 2013, 1:57 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
> > Hm, you broke the comment :)
>
> Luis Silva wrote:
> What do you mean? It all works fine here.
>
> Christoph Feck wrote:
> Yes, because the compiler does not read comments.
>
> Thomas Lübking wrote:
> Aside this, the approach
> On Dec. 26, 2013, 1:57 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
> > Hm, you broke the comment :)
>
> Luis Silva wrote:
> What do you mean? It all works fine here.
>
> Christoph Feck wrote:
> Yes, because the compiler does not read comments.
>
> Thomas Lübking wrote:
> Aside this, the approach
> On Dec. 26, 2013, 1:57 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
> > Hm, you broke the comment :)
>
> Luis Silva wrote:
> What do you mean? It all works fine here.
>
> Christoph Feck wrote:
> Yes, because the compiler does not read comments.
>
> Thomas Lübking wrote:
> Aside this, the approach
> On Dec. 26, 2013, 1:57 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
> > Hm, you broke the comment :)
>
> Luis Silva wrote:
> What do you mean? It all works fine here.
>
> Christoph Feck wrote:
> Yes, because the compiler does not read comments.
>
> Thomas Lübking wrote:
> Aside this, the approach
> On Dec. 26, 2013, 1:57 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
> > Hm, you broke the comment :)
>
> Luis Silva wrote:
> What do you mean? It all works fine here.
>
> Christoph Feck wrote:
> Yes, because the compiler does not read comments.
>
> Thomas Lübking wrote:
> Aside this, the approach
> On Dec. 26, 2013, 1:57 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
> > Hm, you broke the comment :)
>
> Luis Silva wrote:
> What do you mean? It all works fine here.
>
> Christoph Feck wrote:
> Yes, because the compiler does not read comments.
>
> Thomas Lübking wrote:
> Aside this, the approach
> On Dec. 26, 2013, 1:57 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
> > Hm, you broke the comment :)
>
> Luis Silva wrote:
> What do you mean? It all works fine here.
>
> Christoph Feck wrote:
> Yes, because the compiler does not read comments.
>
> Thomas Lübking wrote:
> Aside this, the approach
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114632/
---
(Updated Jan. 6, 2014, 5:47 p.m.)
Review request for Baloo and Vishesh Ha
> On Dec. 26, 2013, 1:57 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
> > Hm, you broke the comment :)
>
> Luis Silva wrote:
> What do you mean? It all works fine here.
>
> Christoph Feck wrote:
> Yes, because the compiler does not read comments.
Aside this, the approach seems too naive?
DOIs have a de
> On Dec. 26, 2013, 1:57 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
> > Hm, you broke the comment :)
>
> Luis Silva wrote:
> What do you mean? It all works fine here.
Yes, because the compiler does not read comments.
- Christoph
---
This is an au
> On Dec. 26, 2013, 1:57 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
> > Hm, you broke the comment :)
What do you mean? It all works fine here.
- Luis
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/11
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114632/#review46156
---
Hm, you broke the comment :)
- Christoph Feck
On Dec. 23, 2
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114632/
---
Review request for Baloo and Vishesh Handa.
Repository: kfilemetadata
D
15 matches
Mail list logo
